On Jul 9, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> In message <20190710004749.89c1b163...@pb-smtp1.pobox.com>,
> Ken Hornstein wrote:
>
>> If I could make sendmail/pipe punch the user in the face every time a
>> message was sent using it...
>
> Please don't. I'm using it.
>
> It is
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> If I could make sendmail/pipe punch the user in the face every time a
>> message was sent using it...
> Please don't. I'm using it.
> It is MUCH faster than trying to feed the message to Postfix
> (aka Sendmail) via SMTP/587 because in the case
In message <20190710004749.89c1b163...@pb-smtp1.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>If I could make sendmail/pipe punch the user in the face every time a
>message was sent using it...
Please don't. I'm using it.
It is MUCH faster than trying to feed the message to Postfix
(aka Sendmail) via
Date:Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:39:08 -0400
From:Ken Hornstein
Message-ID: <20190709233912.db2aa73...@pb-smtp20.pobox.com>
| - We don't, in general, want to have any more #ifdefs in the code unless
| they are completely unavoidable
I agree with that, and even when
>Could we log the entire result, and let the post hook take care of the
>various queue formats?
That was what I suggested. Clearly nmh shouldn't be in the business of
figuring out what (if any) the queue identifier is based on the SMTP
DATA response message.
>> I am neutral about this being
Ken Hornstein wrote:
> - It is not clear to me that you can state with certainly that the
> 250 response code will contain the queue identifier (that is, in
> fact, not a concept that appears anywhere that I can find in the SMTP
> RFCs). As a practical matter I've never had to
On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:43:06 -0400, Steven Winikoff said:
> sm_reply.length = rp - sm_reply.text;
> sm_reply.text[sm_reply.length] = 0;
> +#ifndef NOSYSLOG
> +if (strncmp(sm_reply.text, "OK id=", 6) == 0)
> +{
This is highly dependent on the remote MTA.
Google, for
>Is there any interest in adding an improved version of this to the code
>base?
So ... maybe? But, some thoughts.
- We don't, in general, want to have any more #ifdefs in the code unless
they are completely unavoidable (e.g., operating system differences or
optional third-party libraries
I recently modified my configuration for nmh-1.7.1 to connect directly to
my ISP's sendmail, rather than going through sendmail on my desktop Linux
system.
This works perfectly, but as a side effect I lost all logging of outgoing
messages. This isn't the end of the world, but it's a pain because
>> Let's say in a hypothetical future we support IMAP. That means that
>> nearly every command would take a whole pile of arguments like
>> -initialtls, -host, -port, -sasl, and more. Obviously changing your
>> profile for every nmh command would be awful. So there should be some
>> way of
Hi Valdis,
> > Is -42nd handled?
>
> I admit being totally mystified as to what situations require proper
> handling of negative ordinals
Well, from here the one after next is the 2nd, and the one before last
is the -2nd.
Regardless, the code and documentation should match, and it seems
11 matches
Mail list logo
