Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I just did an upgrade at home to MacOS X Ventura; let me make sure the >test suite passes and there are no obvious issues there. Oof, wait. I just did a "make distcheck" and I get: depbase=`echo uip/mhical.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`;\ cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -g

Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
Is anyone here packaging nmh as part of a .deb file in the process of testing? I used to routinely do that for .rpm packages, but no longer find myself on a system where that makes sense. Thanks. On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 3:48 PM David Levine wrote: > Greetings as we approach the new year. > >

Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread Ken Hornstein
>>Do you or anyone else have anything else you'd like to put in before >>starting the 1.8 release cycle? > >I just did an upgrade at home to MacOS X Ventura; let me make sure the >test suite passes and there are no obvious issues there. I just did that, and it builds fine and passes the test

Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread Ken Hornstein
>Ralph, your last round of changes look good to me. HEAD builds and >tests cleanly for me on Fedora, Solaris 11, and Cygwin. > >Do you or anyone else have anything else you'd like to put in before >starting the 1.8 release cycle? I just did an upgrade at home to MacOS X Ventura; let me make sure

Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi David, > HEAD builds and tests cleanly for me on Fedora, Solaris 11, and > Cygwin. Good to hear. I had a ‘All 118 tests passed’ with 1.7-branchpoint-884-gf116eb31 when doing ‘NMH_VALGRIND=1 VALGRIND_ME=1 make check’ on a friend's quicker PC running Manjaro. > Do you or anyone else have

Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread David Levine
Ralph, your last round of changes look good to me. HEAD builds and tests cleanly for me on Fedora, Solaris 11, and Cygwin. Do you or anyone else have anything else you'd like to put in before starting the 1.8 release cycle? David

Re: send(1) and Draft-Folder.

2022-12-31 Thread David Levine
I wrote: > Ralph wrote: > > Is this equivalent? > > > > Draft-Folder: -draftfolder's default > > I don't like that, because then I have to figure out how -draftfolder > fits in. I might have come across as harsh on that. In reality, I don't have a preference. David

Re: nmh 1.8?

2022-12-31 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Ken, > Sigh. Ralph, you and I don't agree on Content-MD5, which is fine. The issue is not the repeated distractions of only I used the options or what was the point of them anyway. It's that functionality was deleted but at the same time documented as deprecated and the options left in as