Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternative method for supporting TLS and latest patch set

2010-02-02 Thread Peter Maydell
Earl Hood wrote: BTW, I'm working on removing all uses of mktemp from the code and trying to clean-up annoying warnings from gcc when compiling code. Ah, good. I had a bit of a go at that a while ago but ran aground on some of the less trivial bits. Hopefully, I do not break anything. I'll try

Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternative method for supporting TLS and latest patch set

2010-02-02 Thread Ken Hornstein
I'm unsure what the policy is for how stable the trunk is supposed to be, so I hesitant to check in what I have done. I'm with Peter; we don't really have any formal policy as to the stability of HEAD. I've committed code that broke HEAD; it wasn't intentional, and I fixed it as soon as I was

Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternative method for supporting TLS and latest patch set

2010-02-01 Thread Ken Hornstein
It tooks some reading thru the docs, but I did get it to work. Delegate runs as a real proxy server with protocol awareness, so nmh using smtp mode can be used with it. To get complete, expected functionality, modifications to nmh was required, mainly with whom.c so it can support the -port

Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternative method for supporting TLS and latest patch set

2010-02-01 Thread Earl Hood
On February 1, 2010 at 22:06, Ken Hornstein wrote: I looked over your patches; I say commit 'em (I'd personally prefer that nmh had inline TLS support,... I agree, but the changes are also applicable for any non-TLS mail server that requires SASL. The horse has definitely been pounded to