On 12/12/2011 3:25 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> anno can add normal mail headers, e.g. Subject.
>
> I use variations on
>
> anno -component x-inputplus-tag -text "$t" -nodate -inplace "$@"
>
> to compensate for the limit of 32 sequences per folder with no
> cross-folder sequences.
me too. we'll
Hi Paul,
> i think anno is wrong-headed, and inconsistent with the rest of the MH
> philosophy. i believe that once a message has been stored it should
> never be modified.
I've wavered back and forth on this over the decades. :-)
> it's not as if other Maildir-reading mail systems (whether ima
>please extend to me commit privs, tell me where the repo and bug tracker
>are.
Sure. For anyone else who cares, what you need to do is:
- Sign up for an account on savannah (http://savannah.nongnu.org)
- Be non-insane (I'm just throwing that in there, I can't think of
anyone on the nmh-worker
On 12/12/2011 2:23 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> ... will need The MH Guy.
> I'm The MH Guy? When did that happen? :-)
last man standing, or some such.
> The sad part is, if you look at what I've actually DONE, all I've done is
> nibble around the edges of MH (c.f: SMTP, POP). So I never really t
>and for that, ken, we will need you. implementing other storage schemas
>on the underside of the interface can be left as an exercise for the
>ambitious, but to move the current schema into an opaque interface, we
>will need The MH Guy.
I'm The MH Guy? When did that happen? :-)
The sad part is,
coming into this late, will try to summarize.
On 12/10/2011 11:27 AM, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> Earl Hood:
>> Just think of SMIME, PGP, DKIM, et.al. Preserving the original
>> message is handy whenever one needs to (re)verify the message that
>> are signed or encrypted.
> I disagree, one should break
