Bart Massey submitted an update to the mh-format man page as part of
bug report 2031. I'm not an expert on the content, but it looks like
he's done a good job at improving this page.
Please review it, and if there are no corrections, I plan to commit it.
Thanks.
Name
mh-format - format
Apparently the powers that be don't want informational messages to be part
of the 'In-Reply-To: fields anymore (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html).
The obsolete fields could look like:
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:35:24 EDT.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is what
On June 27, 2003 at 14:36, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
Apparently the powers that be don't want informational messages to be part
of the 'In-Reply-To: fields anymore (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html).
The obsolete fields could look like:
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 27 Jun 2003
Hi,
A format string consists of ordinary text, and special
multi-character escapesequences which begin with `%'.
s/eseq/e seq/
Cheers,
Ralph.
