Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-21 Thread Bill Wohler
Neil W Rickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Oct 20, 2003: Problem is, the folder command doesn't work because there are no subdirectories in the mail directory, even though there are links

Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-20 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:06:08 -0700 From:Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Anyone have a problem if I remove this test? Yes. It is that test that makes folder run in manageable time, without it, every message in every folder has to

Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-20 Thread Anders Eriksson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Anyone have a problem if I remove this test? Jon Not really. It might be worth to think about it twice though. I seem to recall reading in, was it the man mage for find(1)??, that this or a similar thing might speed up some types of directory structure traversals

Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-20 Thread Neil W Rickert
Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Oct 20, 2003: Problem is, the folder command doesn't work because there are no subdirectories in the mail directory, even though there are links to them. It is hard to imagine a Mail

Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-20 Thread Jon Steinhart
Robert Elz writes: | Anyone have a problem if I remove this test? Yes. It is that test that makes folder run in manageable time, without it, every message in every folder has to be stat'd to see if it happens to be a directory - with it, folders with no sub-folders (which almost all

Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-20 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:56:55 -0700 From:Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | How about if I change the test so that it is only ignored for the top | level directory? That would do much less harm, but is unlikely to be so easy (that

Re: Anybody mind if I remove this piece of strange code?

2003-10-20 Thread Jon Steinhart
Robert Elz wrote: | How about if I change the test so that it is only ignored for the top | level directory? That would do much less harm, but is unlikely to be so easy (that function gets called for any level in the hierarchy, if I recall correctly). An alternative would be a try