Hi all
Disclaimer first: I'm a mmh-developer and user
We think currently about removing the Previous-Sequence support for
mmh. But because we don't use it we are not sure, if we missed some
aspect of it. Therefor I would like to ask some questions.
When and why was the Previous-Sequence
Date:Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:42:25 +0100
From:Philipp
Message-ID:
| The first completely covered with the shell history.
Aside from what Ralph said, what shell history is that? Consider
a user using dash, or some similar shell.Also consider that the
commands
Hi Philipp,
> 1. in the shell using the same messages again and spare some typing
...
> The first completely covered with the shell history.
If the arguments given to the last nmh command don't have a side effect
then shell history may be useful, but
show next:3
scan !$
doesn't achieve
[2020-03-22 14:58] Ralph Corderoy
> > 1. in the shell using the same messages again and spare some typing
> ...
> > The first completely covered with the shell history.
>
> If the arguments given to the last nmh command don't have a side effect
> then shell history may be useful, but
>
> show
>We think currently about removing the Previous-Sequence support for
>mmh. But because we don't use it we are not sure, if we missed some
>aspect of it. Therefor I would like to ask some questions.
I personally find the previous-sequence rather useful myself (when you
find, for example, the
One of the things I use it for is "unseeing" a message. Let's say I see
someone has emailed me, I'm about to go out, want to take a peek at the
message but don't want to mark it as seen — or alternatively I look at a
message, think "gosh that's gonna take a lot of work to deal with" so
want to
