Re: RE: [NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtualization

2010-09-29 Thread nonmem
and each one has to take advantage of the parallel processing. (It is necessary to specify 2011 budget... .) Thanks. Pavel - Original Message - From: "Bauer, Robert" Date: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:47 pm Subject: RE: [NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtual

RE: [NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtualization

2010-09-27 Thread Bauer, Robert
evsolutions.com From: Denney, William S. [mailto:william_den...@merck.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:58 PM To: Bauer, Robert; nmusers Subject: RE: [NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtualization Hi Bob, Thanks for the detailed response. I'm thinking of

RE: [NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtualization

2010-09-22 Thread Denney, William S.
.com] On Behalf Of Bauer, Robert Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:21 PM To: nmusers Subject: [NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtualization Bill: Yes, we are planning to release NONMEM 8.0 in January. Among other exciting features, it will have parallel computing. From our tests

[NMusers] FW: NM7.2 Parallelization and Virtualization

2010-09-22 Thread Bauer, Robert
Bill: Yes, we are planning to release NONMEM 8.0 in January. Among other exciting features, it will have parallel computing. From our tests, we have found that the optimal number of cores depends on the problem. On one extreme, if the problem contains many subjects, and each subject takes a long