Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-30 Thread Nick Holford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Holford Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 5:14 PM To: nmusers Subject: Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC Matt, Thanks for your comments which I almost completely agree with. You propose to log transform the parameters so

RE: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-28 Thread Matt Hutmacher
complicated. Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Holford Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:12 AM To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com Subject: Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC Mahesh, Thanks for your further info on VPC and PPC. I agree

Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-25 Thread Nick Holford
To: Nick Holford; nmusers@globomaxnm.com Subject: RE: FW: [NMusers] PPC Hi Nick, I have been following this discussion and I think it is very helpful to many of us. Can you please elaborate on that last part about binning? What is that for? I must have missed something there. Thanks, Susan

Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-25 Thread Nick Holford
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Holford Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:12 AM To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com Subject: Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC Mahesh, Thanks for your further info on VPC and PPC. I agree that the bootstrap distribution of the parameters is probably better than

Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-25 Thread makamal
VPC be enough for model verification? Kindly advise...Mahesh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willavize, Susan A Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:38 AM To: Nick Holford; nmusers@globomaxnm.com Subject: RE: FW: [NMusers] PPC Hi Nick, I

Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-25 Thread Nick Holford
Mohamed, When the number of subjects is small then any confidence interval is going to be wide and probably no-one is really interested in it. With studies more suitable for population analysis (at least 25 subjects and preferably over 100 if you want to look for covariate effects) then the

Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-23 Thread Nick Holford
Paul, The procedure you describe is a way of producing a posterior predictive check but I don't know of any good examples of its use. A simpler way of doing a PPC samples the population parameter estimates from a distribution centered on the final estimates with a variance-covariance based

RE: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-23 Thread Willavize, Susan A
-mail is classified as Pfizer Confidential; it is confidential and privileged. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Holford Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:32 AM To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com Subject: Re: FW: [NMusers] PPC Paul

RE: FW: [NMusers] PPC

2008-07-23 Thread Samtani, Mahesh [PRDUS]
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willavize, Susan A Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:38 AM To: Nick Holford; nmusers@globomaxnm.com Subject: RE: FW: [NMusers] PPC Hi Nick, I have been following this discussion and I think it is very helpful to many of us. Can you please elaborate on that last part about binning