On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:32 AM, Richard Bennett wrote:
There is a risk of unfair shut-offs, but it's very, very small and
can be dealt with after the fact in some reasonable way.
I would suggest that the very existence of NNSquad belies this
argument. It's likely that few if any on this list
I think there are a few misunderstandings...
On Jan 28, 2008 9:07 AM, Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason that offending torrents can be so easily identified
(especially in an automated manner) is that the operators of such
systems have not seen a need (up to now) to
I'm going to wind-down on this thread, but what would happen to video's
like 'Telus Idol', that are very controversial in that copyright is not
crystal clear, and the dealing likely fair (news reporting).
See: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1999/125/ for the back story.
Would the
While there may indeed be those who are part of the Net Neutrality effort in
hopes of using piracy towards their own ends, that does not negate the argument
that BitTorrent does have legimate uses and the actions that Comcast took
impacted the usability of BotTorrent for entirely legal
On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Nick Weaver wrote:
Thus all the schemes for video DNA and audio DNA tracking are
robust in the arms race, at least with a bit of effort.
I believe you're grossly underestimating the power of even the
existing tools for obfuscation, as well as the ingenuity of
