To: Nick Weaver
Cc: nnsquad@nnsquad.org
Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: Speculation, how ATT can implement copyright
filtering without wiretapping/dpi...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Nick Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Thus all the schemes for video DNA
On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:32 AM, Richard Bennett wrote:
There is a risk of unfair shut-offs, but it's very, very small and
can be dealt with after the fact in some reasonable way.
I would suggest that the very existence of NNSquad belies this
argument. It's likely that few if any on this list
I think there are a few misunderstandings...
On Jan 28, 2008 9:07 AM, Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason that offending torrents can be so easily identified
(especially in an automated manner) is that the operators of such
systems have not seen a need (up to now) to
I'm going to wind-down on this thread, but what would happen to video's
like 'Telus Idol', that are very controversial in that copyright is not
crystal clear, and the dealing likely fair (news reporting).
See: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1999/125/ for the back story.
Would the
From: Richard Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Edward Almasy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kevin McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nnsquad@nnsquad.org; Nick Weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:24:59 AM
Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: Speculation, how ATT can implement copyright
filtering without
On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Nick Weaver wrote:
Thus all the schemes for video DNA and audio DNA tracking are
robust in the arms race, at least with a bit of effort.
I believe you're grossly underestimating the power of even the
existing tools for obfuscation, as well as the ingenuity of
