BEFORE THE
Federal Communications Commission
WASHINGTON, D.C.
In the matter of) WC Docket No. 07-52
Broadband Industry Practices)
Laurence Brett (Brett) Glass, a sole proprietor doing business as LARIAT, a
wireless Internet service provider in Albany County, Wyoming, respo
There definitely seems to be increasingly wide public interest in network
neutrality issues, and not just from the "usual suspects" in the techie
community.
The ongoing FCC proceedings re Comcast, regardless of their outcome,
have clearly pushed the topic to a new level, as have other recent
Int
Net Neutrality covered on both "All Things Considered" (news break, not
a feature) and a feature story on "Marketplace" this evening.
http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/02/13/net_neutrality/
Coverage on Marketplace surely indicates the issue is becoming known to
a wider audien
Comcast's FCC filing:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6519840991
Ars Technica's summary:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080213-comcast-discloses-network-management-practices.html
Richard Bennett's FCC comments:
There is also a PFF filing mentioned on TLF today:
http://www.techliberation.com/archives/043339.php
--
Seth Schoen
Staff Technologist[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronic Frontier Foundationhttp://www.eff.org/
454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA 94
--- Forwarded message begins ---
NEWS RELEASE
CEI Files Comments on "Net Neutrality"
Contact:
Richard Morrison, 202.331.2273
CEI Files Comments on "Net Neutrality"
Urges FCC to Let Network Practices Evolve in the Market
Washington, D.C., February 13, 2008Today the Competitive Enterprise
I
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/craig_aaron/2008/02/a_tough_pill_to_swallow.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
At 11:39 PM 2/12/2008, Cliff Sojourner wrote:
>yes you can - you look at the DESTINATION IP and you rewrite the DESTINATION
>MAC. and you send it. that's it! the packet has been routed. and you did
>not look past the ENVELOPE.
So, it's OK to look at the "envelope," then? That's already suf
http://www.telegram.com/article/20080213/APF/802130714
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
One question, however:
But is it, should it be, or can it be the ISPs responsibility to block
attacks both outbound and inbound? As a security person, my answer is
a big YES, because thats what we do on corporate networks, and better
net hygiene would be better for all.
The problem is feature cr
10 matches
Mail list logo