http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus2mar02,0,413965.column
"... Last week, the company caused another stir when it paid
passers-by to fill seats at a contentious Federal Communications
Commission hearing where critics turned out in droves to complain
about surrepti
A very short response as I've beaten this issue to the ground many times
before. If you know enough to define Q and S then you have an intelligent
network that knows the meaning of the bits. Useful but not the Internet
The question is not whether there are circumstances in which you want to
app
Fred, et al
While well reasoned, this argument ignores bundling of protocols and a
concept most commonly referred to as minimum acceptable service.
Ignoring P2P, What real-time, jitter, lag and packet loss sensitive
applications do people use broadband for?
Gaming (WoW, FPS, RTS, etc)
Remot
My specialty is not voice, but I do know QoS and the company I work for is
one of the top technically as far as VoIP capabilities. However, I am not a
spokesperson for my company and anything I contribute to NNSquad is my
personal opinion and does not reflect the opinion of my company.
With re
Fred's recent message came through with a subject formatting problem
which has been corrected in the NNSquad Archive, new subject is:
EU Parliament treating Internet censorship as trade barrier
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Fred,
I have to take exception to your suggestion that QoS is "definitely
required" for proper VoIP operation. Most VoIP today operates without
any specific QoS support -- even ISPs that offer this 'thinly veiled
VoIP tax' have carried VoIP successfully without traffic management for
years. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[ John is correct. On closer inspection, the reject is from the
remote MTA, not the local MTA (Verizon), so it falls into the
more ordinary category of remote MTA spam filtering .. ]
Actually, I'm wrong. As Roy politely pointed out to me, the "remote MTA"
is, in
Well, it seems that I have predictive abilities... See this article:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080227-eu-may-begin-treating-net-censorship-as-a-trade-barrier.html
"The European Parliament recently passed a proposal to treat Internet
censorship by repressive regimes as a trade barrie
Hmm. I have to agree with Brett on most of his comments. QoS is definitely
part of the IETF RFC's. And QoS is definitely required for VoIP, in any
network, for it to work properly. The problem is that there is no common
global, or for that matter national, agreement as to how classifications an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Verizon, for some reason, decided that it didn't like one of them
You're misreading the error message:
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: (Snipped for privacy)
Reason: SMTP transmission failure has occurred
Diagno
At 02:53 PM 3/2/2008, Roy J. Tellason wrote:
>They're running something that looks at the content of my emails and bounces
>it if it doesn't like _some URLs_ that I have in it? WTF?
This is quite common, actually. RHSBLs are generally very good ways of
detecting spam zombies -- better than, for
At 10:41 AM 3/2/2008, Seth Johnson wrote:
Despite the fact that Vint works for
them. I'd like to see someone explain how differentiation based on
"types" of applications would not end net neutrality.
I will explain this for you, and I will try to put it very simply.
Network Neutrality simply
[ I really don't want to start another round of tit-for-tat arguments
regarding the portion of the message text below that we've
discussed earlier. But toward the end of this message a new
topic is broached that I don't believe we've talked about
directly on this list yet.
13 matches
Mail list logo
