Municipal Wi-Fi Efforts Faltering
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/22/us/22wireless.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Greetings. Brett Glass has asserted (in private mail) that some of
my editorial comments regarding his statements are ad hominem
attacks and insulting.
Having gone back through the archive, I must admit that I don't read
my comments that way, and I personally think that I've maintained
considerab
Nick Weaver wrote:
Which would those on the list rather have: A blanket block on outbound
port 25, or a heuristic detector blocking outbound port 25 based on
the behavior of the host, even though the dynamic block IS performing
an inspection on the traffic?
A bit like asking if I'd rather be s
[ Ah, it's Spring, and time for the blue sky stuff -- amusing
anyway. Now, who could *ever* get concerned about your local
cable company pointing a video camera at you in the livingroom,
or even better yet, the bedroom! This could give
Pay Per View a whole new meaning
At 09:39 AM 3/21/2008, Lauren Weinstein wrote:
>It's one thing to say that a particular instance of Internet use
>is illegal, but quite another to simply assume and treat an entire
>class of applications as illegal, or to inspect content on an
>a priori basis. The latter would be similar to lis
On the gripping hand, given the hostile reaction on this list to the
idea of "DMCA Takedown Graphs" (which are technically feasible), there
are many in this crowd which object to the idea of removing even
affirmed by a third party as illegal content at all.
Network neutrality should NOT mean that
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/19/phorm_8020_pi/
[ This story has a number of interesting aspects. The horrendous Phorm
concept seems to be imploding rapidly, and offering source code
inspection at this stage seems like passing around copies of White Star's
business plan f
This item from IP touches on an important facet of the NN debate.
It's one thing to say that a particular instance of Internet use
is illegal, but quite another to simply assume and treat an entire
class of applications as illegal, or to inspect content on an
a priori basis. The latter would be s
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/20/hundt_cloud_carr/
The Cloud Computing Revolution will be regulated, according to former
Federal Communications Chairman (FCC) Reed Hundt.
Hundt - who has mounted many a soapbox - is using a review of pundit Nick
Carr's new book The Big Switch as an excuse f
Details on winning bids:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A1.pdf
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A2.pdf
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Lauren Weinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nnsquad@nnsquad.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ NNSquad
10 matches
Mail list logo
