[No Thirst Software] Suggestion: show matched transaction with a lighter(shadow bar)

2009-06-08 Thread prasanth

I was going through my transactions to see where extra ones were
showing up and highlighted all my accounts and just making sure all
transactions that were transfers showed appropriately.  Here I would
have to click on show matching everytime to make sure they were linked
correctly and it would have been helpful to have a lighter bar
highlighted the corresponding matched transaction.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[No Thirst Software] Re: Allocating Income, I had to do 12 times

2009-06-08 Thread bazcurtis

Hi all,

This is what I was trying to achieve, just for clarity.

All my direct debits come out of Moneywell on the 1st of the month. I
am paid on the first on the month. I want to fill my buckets in one go
at that time. From what I am reading I need to set the allocate income
to the 2nd half of the month and all will be well. Looking forward to
next month :-)

Best wishes

Michael


On Jun 8, 3:13 am, Druzyne drew.k...@gmail.com wrote:
 Jason,

 I just wanted to make sure you understand that the Timing of an
 allocation is specified in two places: once on your Spending Plan,
 where you specify First Half/Second Half/All Month for each bucket;
 and second on the Allocate Income panel (after you click the Allocate
 Income icon) where you specify that the allocation is for the First
 Half or Second Half of the month.

 The setting on the Allocate Income panel seems to adjust automatically
 based on the current date, but it can be changed. So, for those like
 myself who are paid once a month, and want to allocate once a month,
 we must specifically choose a Second Half allocation on the first of
 a month for all of our income to be allocated (since it's already
 there). I believe this was what Michael was trying to achieve.

 You really should try to see a difference between the timing of a
 bucket, and the priority of a bucket. Priority means deciding that
 if there are limited funds, the electric bill should always win out
 against a vacation fund. This setting is best for those that have
 variable or unpredictable income. Timing means that if you're paid bi-
 weekly or semi-monthly, you can hold off on allocating to your
 electricity bucket until the second paycheck, because the bill is due
 at the end of the month. These settings have different purposes for
 different situations.

 I'm glad, however, that Kevin shared how priority figures into timing
 and allocation. For those that allocate twice a month, it shows how
 beneficial it would be to always set the timing of low-priority
 buckets to Second Half (in the Spending Plan). It's not a big deal,
 though, since you can always flow money out of low-priority buckets.

 //Drew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[No Thirst Software] Re: Suggestion: show matched transaction with a lighter(shadow bar)

2009-06-08 Thread Kevin Hoctor

On Jun 8, 2009, at 6:00 AM, prasanth wrote:

 I was going through my transactions to see where extra ones were
 showing up and highlighted all my accounts and just making sure all
 transactions that were transfers showed appropriately.  Here I would
 have to click on show matching everytime to make sure they were linked
 correctly and it would have been helpful to have a lighter bar
 highlighted the corresponding matched transaction.


Thanks for the suggestion. I'll add it to the list.

Peace,

Kevin Hoctor
ke...@nothirst.com
No Thirst Software LLC
http://nothirst.com
http://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[No Thirst Software] Re: Allocating Income, I had to do 12 times

2009-06-08 Thread Jason

Thanks everybody for the helpful responses!

On Jun 8, 6:09 am, bazcurtis bazm...@bazmac.co.uk wrote:
 Hi all,

 This is what I was trying to achieve, just for clarity.

 All my direct debits come out of Moneywell on the 1st of the month. I
 am paid on the first on the month. I want to fill my buckets in one go
 at that time. From what I am reading I need to set the allocate income
 to the 2nd half of the month and all will be well. Looking forward to
 next month :-)

 Best wishes

 Michael

 On Jun 8, 3:13 am, Druzyne drew.k...@gmail.com wrote:

  Jason,

  I just wanted to make sure you understand that the Timing of an
  allocation is specified in two places: once on your Spending Plan,
  where you specify First Half/Second Half/All Month for each bucket;
  and second on the Allocate Income panel (after you click the Allocate
  Income icon) where you specify that the allocation is for the First
  Half or Second Half of the month.

  The setting on the Allocate Income panel seems to adjust automatically
  based on the current date, but it can be changed. So, for those like
  myself who are paid once a month, and want to allocate once a month,
  we must specifically choose a Second Half allocation on the first of
  a month for all of our income to be allocated (since it's already
  there). I believe this was what Michael was trying to achieve.

  You really should try to see a difference between the timing of a
  bucket, and the priority of a bucket. Priority means deciding that
  if there are limited funds, the electric bill should always win out
  against a vacation fund. This setting is best for those that have
  variable or unpredictable income. Timing means that if you're paid bi-
  weekly or semi-monthly, you can hold off on allocating to your
  electricity bucket until the second paycheck, because the bill is due
  at the end of the month. These settings have different purposes for
  different situations.

  I'm glad, however, that Kevin shared how priority figures into timing
  and allocation. For those that allocate twice a month, it shows how
  beneficial it would be to always set the timing of low-priority
  buckets to Second Half (in the Spending Plan). It's not a big deal,
  though, since you can always flow money out of low-priority buckets.

  //Drew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[No Thirst Software] Re: Money left in account, but no cash available for flowing?

2009-06-08 Thread HenrikWL

Ok, I've managed to get things aligned, but something doesn't sit
right with the way I did it.

What I basically did, was transfer an amount of money equal to what
was overspent in my expense buckets from my savings account,
registering this in an income bucket. I allocated the money to the
expense buckets, and then transferred all of the money back to the
savings account.

I basically conjured up spendable money out of nothing. :S I'm
confident that the fault lies with my bookkeeping and not with me
actually overspending, but I'm still interested in finding out where
my logic fails here.

The one thing I've done that I'm unsure of, is this: every month, I
transfer a fixed amount of money into my savings account, assigning it
to the Savings expense bucket. However, this month I had to pull
some money out of the savings account due to unforeseen expenses
(that's what the savings account is there for after all). I
transferred money from the savings account into the spending account
assigning this transaction to the Emergency dip into savings income
bucket, allocated the required amount of money to the Unforeseen
expenses expense bucket and payed off the expense, registering this
with the same expense bucket.

Is this the right way to go about such a use of savings money?

I'm feeling incredibly dense here, so if anyone could set me straight
here, even pointing out the obvious, I'd be grateful. :S

On Jun 7, 5:30 pm, HenrikWL henrik.w.l...@gmail.com wrote:
 The thing is, there was no starting balance for the accounts. I
 started using MW at the same time I changed banks, so all of my
 accounts had zero balance in them. I guess the closest thing to a
 starting balance transaction was the couple of deposits of money
 that were transferred from my old bank, but the way I assigned these
 to an income bucket was via the Change money flow start date and set
 the starting cash flow amount there.

 I have tried setting this amount to zero and assigning the initial
 transactions to income buckets, but the whole thing ends up exactly
 the same.

 The only way I can think that this kind of thing has happened was if
 we recieved cash that we forgot to register in Moneywell, but rembered
 to register when we used them. And while we're on the subject of cash,
 I have no way of knowing if the cash balance is correct. I find the
 cash account to be impossible to keep track of, what with the two of
 us (me and my wife) receving and spending cash from a number of
 different sources, and with cash lying around the house, in pockets,
 in the car, etc. :S

 But still, I would think that this lack of control would lead to the
 opposite problem: that there was no money in our accounts, yet still
 more to spend in our income buckets. :S

 Oh well. The amounts in question aren't vast, so I guess I could just
 transfer them into the savings account (which is never available for
 spending anyways) and then just pull the missing spendable amount back
 into the spending account, registering the transaction in an income
 bucket.

 On Jun 7, 3:58 pm, Patrick Burleson pburle...@gmail.com wrote:



  On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:16 AM, HenrikWLhenrik.w.l...@gmail.com wrote:

   Ok, there's weirdness.

   I currently find myself in the situation that all my expense buckets
   are empty, yet I have money left on my spending accounts. All incoming
   transactions to these accounts have been allocated to income  buckets,
   and all outgoing transactions have been allocated to expense buckets
   (except transfers between them that have been purely administrative),
   and to my mind, I should still have allocateable money so long as I
   have money in my spending accounts.

   The account balances in MW match the account balances in my bank, so I
   have not left out any transactions so far as I can see.

   Where do I even begin to investigate?

  Check your Starting Balance transaction for the accounts and make
  sure they were assigned to an income bucket. That'd be my guess.

  Patrick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[No Thirst Software] Re: Hiding future pending transactions, but not from buckets

2009-06-08 Thread Druzyne

 I'm trying to 'Hide Future Pending Transactions' and 'Define Future
 Pending Time Period' of '30 days'.

 I've configured Moneywell with these settings but it appears that my
 pending transactions for the month (within the 30 day mark) do not
 deduct from my buckets.

 How can I hide my future pending transactions, while keeping my
 current pending transactions reflected in my buckets?

I asked about this very same thing earlier, in this thread:

http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software/browse_thread/thread/8728753712c3918f/6e81f59476453841

It's not possible at the moment, but Kevin states he is looking at
improving the process for managing future cash flow. However, he
indicated it won't appear before version 2.

For me, it was far more important to have my buckets deducted early,
so I could compensate while there was still money in other buckets. I
don't have any repeating transactions, but since most of the
information is memorized, and keyboard entry is so fast, it's not
terribly painful to make an entry each month. Also, there's some extra
effort involved in changing the date for those months when the
transaction cannot fall on the regular day, or in changing the amount.

//Drew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[No Thirst Software] Re: Money left in account, but no cash available for flowing?

2009-06-08 Thread Druzyne

 What I basically did, was transfer an amount of money equal to what
 was overspent in my expense buckets from my savings account,
 registering this in an income bucket. I allocated the money to the
 expense buckets, and then transferred all of the money back to the
 savings account.

 I basically conjured up spendable money out of nothing. :S I'm
 confident that the fault lies with my bookkeeping and not with me
 actually overspending, but I'm still interested in finding out where
 my logic fails here.

 The one thing I've done that I'm unsure of, is this: every month, I
 transfer a fixed amount of money into my savings account, assigning it
 to the Savings expense bucket. However, this month I had to pull
 some money out of the savings account due to unforeseen expenses
 (that's what the savings account is there for after all). I
 transferred money from the savings account into the spending account
 assigning this transaction to the Emergency dip into savings income
 bucket, allocated the required amount of money to the Unforeseen
 expenses expense bucket and payed off the expense, registering this
 with the same expense bucket.

 Is this the right way to go about such a use of savings money?

Henrik,

I'm not sure if this will correct your issue, but there's a different
way I handle having to pull out of savings. When transferring the
money into your spending account, I would have assigned the deposit to
your Savings bucket, thereby negating what you spent by moving into
savings earlier. Then, the money that is in your Savings bucket you
can flow to the expense bucket where it is needed.

I may be wrong, but when you assigned the transfer back to your
spending account to an income bucket, it was like printing yourself
another paycheck, which might have thrown things off. It's better to
look at this type of transaction as unspending on Savings, rather
than as income.

//Drew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups No 
Thirst Software User Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to no-thirst-software@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
no-thirst-software+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---