Ok thanks for the confirmation Isaac. The latest version of node-gyp
(v0.0.5) now has its dependencies bundled.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 18:34, Nathan Rajlich
> wrote:
> > And on top of that, I could just as easily just start commiting th
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 18:34, Nathan Rajlich wrote:
> And on top of that, I could just as easily just start commiting the
> node_modules dir so that git-clone works properly.
That's a good idea regardless, actually. Commit the node_modules
folder, and list all the deps as bundledDependencies.
And on top of that, I could just as easily just start commiting the
node_modules dir so that git-clone works properly. Then what argument is
there for not using node-gyp?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Nathan Rajlich wrote:
> So Billy your argument is that you don't want to use node-gyp since i
So Billy your argument is that you don't want to use node-gyp since it has
dependencies, and you for some reason are against npm? Well that's a
first... What possible argument could you have at this point for not
wanting to use npm? It comes with node!!!
Additionally, limiting yourself to just mod
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
> Wow, that looks really cool.
>
> The readme doesn't mentioning actually creating a gyp file. You still
> have to do that, right? It'd be nice to document what it should look
> like.
>
README updated! Thanks for the shout-out on nodeup to
Wow, that looks really cool.
The readme doesn't mentioning actually creating a gyp file. You still
have to do that, right? It'd be nice to document what it should look
like.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 19:15, Christopher Jeffrey wrote:
> Works well for me, very painless. I hope others start support
Ok I just tagged and published v0.0.1 of node-gyp on npm.
Here is the repo: https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-gyp
Native addon devs, please try it out and begin migrating your module to
using gyp. Let me know about your results!!
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:13 PM, rhdoenges wrote:
> I will con
