Re: Plans for Node.js

On 07/12/15 13:41, Stephen Gallagher wrote: nodejs-millstone-0.6.16-4.fc24 reports: DEBUG util.py:393: Error: nothing provides nodejs(v8-abi) = 4.6 needed by nodejs-zipfile-0.5.9-3.fc24.aarch64 This was due to a typo that I added to the nodejs-4.2.2 series of builds; the nodejs(v8-abi) was

Re: Plans for Node.js

W dniu 07.12.2015 o 13:55, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze: Found issues to fix on packaging side: node-gyp depends on v8-devel while nodejs 4.2.x bundles it - dependency needs to be removed docco: created /usr/share/doc/docco/resources and not packaged it. nodejs-millstone-0.6.16-4.fc24

Re: lodash

Do I understand it correctly, that whenever I'll need a lodash.something dependency, I'll just need to require lodash package? - Original Message - From: "Tom Hughes" To: "Node.js on Fedora" Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 6:13:33 PM

Re: Plans for Node.js

On 03/12/15 00:55, Tom Hughes wrote: Ones which have been updated to new upstream releases and/or patches from upstream and built in the side tag: nodejs-i2c nodejs-libxmljs One where work is still needed: nodejs-node-stringprep has a patch on github but the comments suggest it still has

Re: Plans for Node.js

W dniu 01.01.1970 o 01:00, Stephen Gallagher pisze: Someone needs to step up to lead these updates. I certainly don't have the time and packaging experience to do this. I have the packaging experience and can try to help with reviews, but my daily tasks will prevent me from doing a lot of

Re: Plans for Node.js

On 07/12/15 12:55, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: nodejs-fs-ext ExclusiveArch only for primary instead of %{nodejs_arches} I've pushed a fix for this and it's building in the side tag now. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___