case the coffee script is the real source, so shouldn't I really
be packaging the github tar ball and building the js from that as part
of the rpm?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs
nan at the same time as pushing it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/nodejs
On 14/08/14 22:41, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
What do people think about this approach?
Looks nice. I was having nightmares about texlive.spec but your lua
magic here is much nicer and easier to see what's going
a couple awaiting review in return:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123071
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
but I guess this is a case where the node naming rules should take
precedence, especially given that there is a conflict and we may need
have both at some point?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs
this evening. I've got a couple of nodejs packages
awaiting review if you'd like to help out in return:
1223550 nodejs-fill-keys
1257707 nodejs-should-http
Beyond that I have some C++ based packages awaiting review if you're up
for dealing with that.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
on aarch64 were done
too early, before nodejs 4.2.3 was built.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
) as well?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
there are also a number
of new dependencies that will need packaging.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
build on
unsupported platforms. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js#ExclusiveArch
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin
On 06/12/15 13:52, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
On 05/12/15 07:50, Tom Hughes wrote:
I've knocked up a prototype now:
https://tomh.fedorapeople.org/lodash.spec
https://tomh.fedorapeople.org/lodash-3.10.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
The precise details are slightly different than I described because I
On 03/12/15 00:55, Tom Hughes wrote:
Ones which have been updated to new upstream releases and/or patches
from upstream and built in the side tag:
nodejs-i2c
nodejs-libxmljs
One where work is still needed:
nodejs-node-stringprep has a patch on github but the comments suggest it
still has
On 17/11/15 19:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 16/11/15 16:46, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu
<mailto:t...@compton.nu>> wrote:
So, what do people think?
Sounds reasonable to me.
I've knocked up a prototype no
On 03/12/15 17:29, Tom Hughes wrote:
If you load index.html in a browser it will run the tests, but I can't
see any obvious way to run it from the command line and it relies on
injecting methods into the window object.
So you can do it with node-qunit... But it's a bit fiddly...
npm install
, the tests run, but I get five
failing tests. :-(
Sure, but the same five that fail if you just load index.html in a
browser ;-)
I didn't dig into that...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs
build failed on ARM with an undefined reference when
linking:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12026059
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6059/12026059/build.log
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 07/12/15 12:55, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
nodejs-fs-ext
ExclusiveArch only for primary instead of %{nodejs_arches}
I've pushed a fix for this and it's building in the side tag now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
to:
require('readable-stream').Transform
It illustrates the basic point though, that there can be other top level
js files that you can require as module/file or test as:
node -e "require('./file')"
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
on them?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
Could somebody have a look at reviewing 1274512 please, only I just
accidentally pushed a nodejs-tape update that requires it...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On 13/01/16 13:09, Piotr Popieluch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu
<mailto:t...@compton.nu>> wrote:
On 13/01/16 11:43, notificati...@fedoraproject.org
<mailto:notificati...@fedoraproject.org> wrot
in all the spec files, so
that they could be extended in future without changing every spec.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/
ed the way it is because of what they advised...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/06/16 14:12, Tom Hughes wrote:
I'm not sure what happens if you update with dnf system-upgrade but if
you have both nodejs and npm installed and try and distro-sync to F24
then you will fail with:
I've tried system-upgrade and it fails in the same way.
The good news
That ticket is about EPEL6 though, where the macro isn't defined!
I don't have an EPEL7 machine to check, but does it not have a
redhat-rpm-config that contains /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.nodejs-srpm
which defines the nodejs_arches macro?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
for npm-registry-client...
Are you available to join Jared and I on IRC today? (What's your
nick?) We're coordinating our efforts to get as much done as possible.
I'm tomhughes on freenode. I've just jumped in to #fedora-devel.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
?
Incidentally, is there a good reason why we don't merge the side tag
given that all the binary issues are sorted and we seem to be doing the
npm stack in the main tag anyway?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
ve.req in
the %install section with those rules.
Why makes the second conflicts though? Why not:
Requires: nodejs(abi) >= %{abi_major}.%{abi_minor}
Requires: nodejs(abi) < %{abi_major+1}
Which is what the dependency generator would do for a caret dependency
on a node module.
Tom
--
T
On 10/03/16 16:20, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 03/10/2016 06:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mar 10, 2016, at 4:43 AM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
- The npm doesn't work at all because all the bundled modules are in
the node_modules.bundled directory and node_modules is
On 02/05/16 19:31, Robert Van Voorhees wrote:
When building Node for Fedora 23 I think I encountered the error you
were alluding to with `libuv` [3]:
Yes you will need to build a newer libuv package first.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
matches the nodejs provided version. Note that it was broken and
requiring v3 but I fixed that in a zero day update.
Even without kosmtik installed you still hit the problem on upgrade
though so long as you have both npm and nodejs installed.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu
.15 into rawhide now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
in and updating them to a version that
supports nan 2.x I think.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 29/08/16 17:46, Tom Hughes wrote:
The nodejs 6.5.0 build that is running now breaks v8 abi so binary
extensions will need to be rebuilt.
I've got my script ready to go and will run it for rawhide and f25 once
the f25 build of nodejs completes - ideally we will then need to add
those
the people
you're asking what the error is.
I suspect that you just haven't linked the modules you need to your
current working directory - node will not search the global modules for
you so you need "npm link sqlite3" to make it available to your program.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@
On 29/08/16 17:49, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/29/2016 12:46 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
The nodejs 6.5.0 build that is running now breaks v8 abi so binary extensions
will need to be rebuilt.
I've got my script ready to go and will run it for rawhide and f25 once the f25
build of nodejs completes
.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8491 but looks like
it isn't merged yet...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
the repo should be notified to the sig list.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
are you updating from? and if it's a significant version change
then what other dependants does it have that might get broken?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
be ok.
You need to talk to the rubygem maintainer though, as that always has to
be updated in lockstep with the main package.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
the SIG should probably be
aware of what's going on before it hits
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
the build of the engine.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
up for review
at the moment:
1425074 - nodejs-humanize-ms
and also a few C++ libraries that are needed to be able to update one of
my node packages if you're up for doing them:
1440481 - mapbox-variant
1440489 - geometry-hpp
1440508 - wagyu
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- no
/blob/master/package.json
Somebody should update it then ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On 30/08/2019 14:44, Ben Rosser wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:59 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/2019 20:01, Ben Rosser wrote:
Hm, does it make sense then to have a compatibility package for lodash3?
I think we may have to multiversion it yes. Been thinking that for
a while.
I'll try
it. Plus lodash has a crazy system that packages
the same code is lots of different variants.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le
updated grunt-legacy-log-utils and grunt-legacy-log
though I have no idea if they still work as I had to disable
the tests because there are circular dependencies on the
rest of grunt but hopefully once you update that I can
turn them back on.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
s and nodejs-http-errors will fix things, but that could
probably affect other packages as well.
I think vows is fine - there is a 0.8.3 but mostly it should be
no problem once eyes is back.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
no
ing like:
VERSION="$(rpmspec --srpm --queryformat=%{VERSION} -q nodejs-${PACKAGE}.spec)"
and then:
npm pack ${PACKAGE}@${VERSION}
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedo
was in F33 but as it's a
build only issue it doesn't really matter for F32 unless you're
trying to build an update for one of them.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 14/09/2020 23:07, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 12:13 +0100, Tom Hughes via nodejs wrote:
On 14/09/2020 10:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
koschei notifications says that a lot of packages stopped to build
on
F32 [1] in build.log the error is "/usr/bin/node: No such file or
dire
of date, because of tricky dependency issues in
the newer versions so that dependency count will go up if it
is updated I think.
I also wonder if you missed some build/test toolchains
that are required? Only that is where of the nasty trees
of dependencies are I think.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@co
-tmp
nodejs-tough-cookie
nodejs-type-detect
nodejs-uid2
nodejs-uri-js
nodejs-uri-path
nodejs-utilities
nodejs-utils-merge
nodejs-vows
nodejs-with
nodejs-xml2js
nodejs-xmlbuilder
nodejs-zap
nodejs-zipfile
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
g to build them as part of
a large bundled tree is going to be incredibly painful.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedorap
56 matches
Mail list logo
