Hello,
I actually vote for letting the annual indication go all together. We
have proved that we can organize an event at least once a year.
So the suggested naming convention:
NPW::<city>
should even apply for Copenhagen, Olso, Stockholm, Riga and Talinn.
So we can have more NPWs in a year if we want to.
jonasbn
On 27/05/2009, at 14.13, Andrew Shitov wrote:
Let NPW::$year be the NPW that rotates yearly between nordic
countries
and, say, NPW::Riga (or NPW::Baltic or NPW::Tallinn)
OK, I've got your point.
Any possible Baltic event can have "NPW" substring in its name only if
the event is the part of NPW. Otherwise it is just silly.
--
Andrew Shitov
______________________________________________________________________
a...@shitov.ru | http://shitov.ru
