https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334
--- Comment #2 from Jörn Guy Süß ---
Would you accept a PR for a formatter that does work for end users?
You may be formally correct, that has never helped practical acceptance.
Eclipse still counts as IDE number two in world rankings. Your
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65327
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Bodewig ---
Many thanks for you contribution. I'm not sure I understand why you opened this
issue.
If it is just in order to share your code, it may be easier for people to use
if you published it as gist at github
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
Bug ID: 65337
Summary: games online
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.10
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Compress Antlib
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334
Bug ID: 65334
Summary: Xml Test output does not satisfy Schema
Product: Ant
Version: 1.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65327
Bug ID: 65327
Summary: XMLProperties
Product: Ant
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #8 from Stanislav Šimek ---
Hi,
Yes lets give a try. Please be patient, it takes ~ 10 days. To bring it to your
build farm. Meanwhile really thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65315
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |1.10.11
--- Comment #7 from Stefan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65323
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Bodewig ---
When we started to support parallel execution of tasks Ant's Project instance
started to associate executing tasks with threads - there is a ThreadLocal that
knows the "current task". If somethi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65323
Bug ID: 65323
Summary: غیر قابل ردیابی شوم
Product: Ant
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #5 from Stanislav Šimek ---
Okay, sounds good. Does it mean that it will be fixed in feature?
Or I can try to patch on my side. Are there any specific location where
synchronization block must be added?
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Bodewig ---
realThing is set to null in the finally block of execute. There could be a race
condition where output is created on the thread that parallel has associated
with the thread after the finally block has
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #3 from Stanislav Šimek ---
Hi
ant -v shows:
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.9 compiled on September 27 2020
Yes the files should be okay. I have checked callstack together with lines and
it fits.
I'm really sorry, but I do not have
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #2 from Jaikiran Pai ---
I just re-read your message again. You say parallel builds and sporadic issue.
I think this might be a sign that we have a race condition in that part of the
code. Is it possible to share a sample build
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Jaikiran Pai changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Jaikiran Pai
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Bug ID: 65316
Summary: Parallel build sporadic error -
UnknownElement.handleErrorOutput
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.9
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65315
Bug ID: 65315
Summary: Antlib does not use ant:current namespace for
definition
Product: Ant
Version: 1.4
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #15 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> I've filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263898 to track this.
The issue in the JDK has been fixed and available in a early access release of
JDK 17.
Additionally, in our recently relea
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65261
imeldania changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
URL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65261
Bug ID: 65261
Summary: togel online
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.9
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DBPatch Antlib
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39780
Neo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlosber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5003
--- Comment #42 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Is this still noticed against Java 11 (or Java 16) versions?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5003
--- Comment #41 from Stefan Franke ---
@Jochen: your link explains why my hack (adding timeouts to join()) helped.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5003
--- Comment #40 from Jochen Wiedmann ---
Without looking at the Ant implementation: Could this be related to
http://grumpyapache.blogspot.com/2020/10/incompatibility-of-processwaitfor.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229
Bug ID: 65229
Summary: body to body spa near me
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.7
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
--- Comment #1 from Carsten Hammer ---
see
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/df121979c0a2469c00dbd8434a565a30a0c9bf03#diff-ce904b6378ce521a3a2e936e4aedd40753aeb9ab7f334783ea7a3da45625bf7d
for how it worked to add support for skipped
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
Carsten Hammer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
Bug ID: 65221
Summary: Report Ignored/Skipped JUnit Tests in junitreport Task
- aborted tests
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Bodewig ---
The reason is that Ant needs to ensure full control over the permissions for
the temporary directory in order to deal with CVE-2020-11979
The release notes of 1.10.9 hint at it
* If the magic property
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #10 from Rajesh Putta ---
Thanks Stefan. We do not see such temp folder creation issues with Ant version
of 1.10.8.
Only after we upgraded our component to use Ant 1.10.9, we started noticing the
temp folder issues.
I am
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Bodewig ---
what you see is the expected bahvior that we may need to document more clearly.
I wouldn't expect any code change in Ant as your way of using Ant really is an
edge case (creating mutltiple instances
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #8 from Rajesh Putta ---
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the update. At the moment we have changed our code to reflect as
shown here which is exactly as you mentioned.
public void executeFixCrlf() throws IllegalOperationException
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Bodewig ---
We have changed Ant to use a temporary directory of its own whenever it needs
to create a temporary file. Likely those temporary files get removed quickly,
so you never see them showing up.
More details
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #6 from Rajesh Putta ---
Hi Jaikiran,
Thanks for the update. Yes you got it right and that is what we are
experiencing at the moment.
Can this issue be fixed. With our frequency with which we are running these Ant
folders
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #5 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello Rajesh,
Thank you for those details. A few additional questions:
> Java based component internally uses Apache Ant and as
a result we end up seeing too many temp directories with name prefixed
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #4 from Rajesh Putta ---
Hi Jaikiran,
We have a component based on java which executes custom scripts on scheduled
interval to collect metrics and reports them to a centralised controller where
end users can view those metrics
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #3 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> Or does each run create one and leave it behind?
I think your original post already answers that:
> All of them are deleted on JVM exit.
So it looks like one single run of Ant creat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #2 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello Rajesh,
Are all those directories created in one single run of an Ant build? Or does
each run create one and leave it behind? Would you be able to attach a simple
build script which reproduces
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
--- Comment #1 from Rajesh Putta ---
Created attachment 37792
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37792=edit
Attachment showing temp folders
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
Bug ID: 65212
Summary: Apache Ant 1.10.9 version generating temp folders
which are prefixed by Ant
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.9
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://www.situslotjoker.c |
|om
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Lala lulu changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
URL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Bug ID: 65209
Summary: bug of wall
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.5
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: AntUnit
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #21 from Jaikiran Pai ---
That's really good to hear. Thank you for testing this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #20 from Michael Seele ---
Hi Jaikiran,
seems like the "IOException: Pipe broken" is gone after your last commit.
Thanks for your work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #19 from Jaikiran Pai ---
>[junitlauncher] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Pipe broken
>[junitlauncher]at
>java.base/java.io.PipedInputStream.read(PipedInputStream.java:321)
>[junitlauncher]at
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #14 from Stefan Bodewig ---
I know Alan's comment was meant for the JDK developers, but it could provide a
workaround for us as well.
In either case, using the new "discard" option I'm about to add this weekend
seems to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #13 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello Stefan,
> We could check the file size and omit TRUNC_EXISTING (i.e. asking for WRITE
> only) for existing zero length files if I understand Alan's comment to your
> JDK issue correctly
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #12 from Stefan Bodewig ---
Great, thanks.
As indicated on the mailing list I'd like to solve the underlying issue in a
different way (make it possible to discard output using new attributes rather
than null devices).
I'm
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #11 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Thank you Stefan for that example. My earlier numerous experiments to get this
reproduced on Windows hadn't been productive because I kept assuming "append"
to be true in the code at
https://
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #10 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Thank you Stefan for that example. Let me try and reproduce this on a system
where I can try a few things.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Bodewig ---
Windows 10 (Professional 20H2) that is
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Bodewig ---
> java -fullversion
openjdk full version "1.8.0_265-b01"
I can try a different JDK, if you want.
Stacktrace starts with
C:\Users\Stefan Bodewig\ant\test.xml:2: E
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65197
Bug ID: 65197
Summary: bug of wall
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.8
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #7 from Jaikiran Pai ---
If anyone of you would be able to provide the build script to reproduce this,
please also include the version and vendor of Java with which it was reproduced
and also the version of Windows OS in use
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #6 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello George,
Would you be able to share that build file which reproduces this issue on
Windows?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #18 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> After the deadlock fix it does not affect our tests (except we have this
> stack traces in the log, but that's not the biggest problem).
That's good to hear. That way we can proceed with t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #17 from Michael Seele ---
(In reply to Jaikiran Pai from comment #16)
> Thank you for testing it. It's interesting that it still runs into this
> error. I'll spend some time on this later. Is this exception affecting the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #16 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Thank you for testing it. It's interesting that it still runs into this error.
I'll spend some time on this later. Is this exception affecting the test runs
in any way in your setup? That will let me
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #15 from Michael Seele ---
The IOException is not fixed with your last commit. Still got
[junitlauncher] Failed in syserr streaming
[junitlauncher] java.io.UncheckedIOException: java.io.IOException: Pipe broken
[junitlauncher
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #14 from Michael Seele ---
(In reply to Jaikiran Pai from comment #13)
> I think I found the cause of this IOException. I have pushed a commit which
> I think should fix this IOException
> https://github.com/apache/a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #13 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> I will pay a closer attention to the code in this task to see if there's a
> possibility which could trigger this error
I think I found the cause of this IOException. I have pushed a commit w
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #12 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Thank you for testing this and posting the results. It's good to know that the
deadlock no longer exists. So this bug is actually fixed.
As for the underlying IOException which was triggering
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #11 from Michael Seele ---
I can confirm the dealock is fixed. I got the following output per "previous
deadlock":
[junitlauncher] Failed in syserr streaming
[junitlauncher] java.io.UncheckedIOException: java.io.IOExcep
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #10 from Michael Seele ---
Thank you. I'll give it a try and will report back if that solves the deadlock
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330
--- Comment #5 from George Thomas ---
We had encountered this after upgrading to Ant 1.10.5 from 1.10.1 and after
some further investigation I confirmed that this had first broken in 1.10.2.
Here's a stacktrace from a simple build file I had
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
--- Comment #9 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> But like Stefan says, it doesn't mean that this code has an issue.
I can't find the edit button and reading that sentence again, I'm not sure I
was clear on what I meant. So rephrasing - it's cl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
Jaikiran Pai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |1.10.10
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65176
Bug ID: 65176
Summary: Introduce forkmode in JUnitLauncher task
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.8
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Bodewig ---
I'm sure you didn't mean to report this at the Apache Ant project :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Bug ID: 65170
Summary: endless futex_wait engages randomly when building
libgdx (concretely while executing g++) on aarch64
(musl libc)
Product: Ant
Version
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65157
--- Comment #2 from Sebb ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65157
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65157
Bug ID: 65157
Summary: Ant manual 1.10.6 and 1.10.7 should be removed from
mirrors
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.6
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
Bug ID: 65148
Summary: AntLauncher terminates enclosing VM
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://www.fieldengineer.c |
|om/skills/cloud
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146
srugamk changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
URL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146
Bug ID: 65146
Summary: If you want to work as a Smart Hands Engineer, we’ve
got all the information you need to know before making
this career change.
Product: Ant
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
Stefan Bodewig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://bit.ly/3pygYX1 |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Bodewig ---
The content of attachment 37734 has been deleted for the following reason:
spam
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
cryptodust changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bit.ly/3pygYX1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
Bug ID: 65134
Summary: New 'Crypto Dusting' Attack Gives Cash
Product: Ant
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65110
Jaikiran Pai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |1.10.10
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65110
Jaikiran Pai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65110
--- Comment #3 from Jaikiran Pai ---
I pushed a fix for this upstream and should be available in next release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65110
--- Comment #2 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> I don't think there is a way to replace an artifact once published, so the
> best we can do is fixing it for the next release.
Plus the fact that this seems to be broken (for this specific ar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
--- Comment #5 from Jaikiran Pai ---
> I think already handles this,
Indeed. The Get task implementation completely disables the redirection
handling on the HttpURLConnection (by setting ((HttpURLConnection)
connect
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65110
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Bodewig ---
I think what you see here is the result of Ant developers trying to use Maven
:-)
Or it is the interaction between Ivy and the poms. When running "mvn
source:jar" I get a non-empty archive l
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Bodewig ---
I think already handles this, see also bug 62499
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65110
Bug ID: 65110
Summary: Source artifact for ant-testutil is empty
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65100
--- Comment #2 from Lan ---
Thanks for your reply. I tried the test case using java 1.8.0_181. Java
behavior is correct.
Output:
Without carret matches: true
With carret matches: true
I also found something interesting
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
--- Comment #3 from Jaikiran Pai ---
I gave this a quick try and indeed, there's an issue here even with
setInstanceFollowRedirects being set on the HttpURLConnection that we use
internally. So I decided to keep out Ant from the equation
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua?action=downloadfilename=/daemon/binaries/commons-daemon-1.2.3-bin.tar.gz
Redirects to an https mirror, the redirect is not followed and the http
condition passes because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
--- Comment #1 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello Mark,
I had a quick look at the code in Ant and from what I can see by default we do
follow redirects[1]. So:
> Redirects from http to https are not followed. This is unexpected.
This should
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
Bug ID: 65105
Summary: http condition does not follow http to https redirect
Product: Ant
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
601 - 700 of 7935 matches
Mail list logo
