https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
Jaikiran Pai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
--- Comment #6 from Florian Rosenauer ---
Thank you, I tested and it looks fine now!
case 1: old non SSL - working
useFtps="false"
useSecureDataChannel="false"
case 2: new FTPS - working
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
--- Comment #5 from Jaikiran Pai ---
I hadn't noticed the nightly build was running into an error. Please try build
number 220 which has completed now and published the artifacts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
--- Comment #4 from Florian Rosenauer ---
Hello Jaikiran,
thanks for the changes, yeah that PBSZ is a bit strange here :)
I can test it soon but unfortunately I cannot see artifacts in the failed
builds #217-#219 in https://ci-builds.apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
--- Comment #3 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello Florian, I read up a bit about the PBSZ command and I think you are right
that we should issue a PBSZ=0 before issuing the PROT command. The command with
PBSZ=0 value itself is apparently redundant sin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
--- Comment #2 from Florian Rosenauer ---
Hello Jaikiran, thank you very much for the support and the change! I tested
the version from
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant_Nightly/215/artifact/ with the
additional useSecureDataChannel=
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
--- Comment #1 from Jaikiran Pai ---
Hello Florian, it appears that you have sufficiently narrowed this down to
what's causing the issue. From what you state (and based on my very superficial
knowledge of FTPS), it appears like for the data cha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773
Florian Rosenauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosena...@gmx.net
--
You are rece