[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-2599) Look Aside Files (LAF) are not cleaned up after merge

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-2599. - Resolution: Fixed > Look Aside Files (LAF) are not cleaned up after merge >

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-2599) Look Aside Files (LAF) are not cleaned up after merge

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet reassigned ASTERIXDB-2599: --- Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet > Look Aside Files (LAF) are not cleaned up

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2599) Look Aside Files (LAF) are not cleaned up after merge

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2599: --- Summary: Look Aside Files (LAF) are not cleaned up after merge Key: ASTERIXDB-2599 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2599 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2517) Ingestion process failed on a cluster with two machines.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16830701#comment-16830701 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2517: -   Ok .. my machine was under attack.

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2517) Ingestion process failed on a cluster with two machines.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16830654#comment-16830654 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2517: - I got the same issue as well. Except there

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-2480) JSON Parser failed at NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-2480. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.9.5 > JSON Parser failed at NPE >

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-2492) Skip filter for undo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-2492. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.9.5 > Skip filter for undo >

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2531) Normalized keys are ignored for optional fields

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2531: --- Summary: Normalized keys are ignored for optional fields Key: ASTERIXDB-2531 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2531 Project: Apache

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-1726) Recovery fails because of negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-1726. - Resolution: Fixed > Recovery fails because of negative value >

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2491) Recovery fail for large tuples (short integer overflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16787033#comment-16787033 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2491: - Thanks Mike B. The bug has been reported

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-2501) Redo failed at negative length value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-2501. - Resolution: Fixed > Redo failed at negative length value >

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2501) Redo failed at negative length value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16761285#comment-16761285 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2501: - I think the bug goes back to 2016:

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2493) In-memory LSM filter is not thread safe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2493: Description: To reproduce the issue: 1- Setup a cluster with a single NC and a

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2493) In-memory LSM filter is not thread safe

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2493: --- Summary: In-memory LSM filter is not thread safe Key: ASTERIXDB-2493 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2493 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-2492) Skip filter for undo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet reassigned ASTERIXDB-2492: --- Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet > Skip filter for undo >

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2492) Skip filter for undo

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2492: --- Summary: Skip filter for undo Key: ASTERIXDB-2492 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2492 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-2491) Recovery fail for large tuples (short integer overflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet reassigned ASTERIXDB-2491: --- Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet > Recovery fail for large tuples (short

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2491) Recovery fail for large tuples (short integer overflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2491: Attachment: nc-1.log cc.log > Recovery fail for large tuples

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2491) Recovery fail for large tuples (short integer overflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16713136#comment-16713136 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2491: - Attached. I changed it from 2-bytes

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2491) Recovery fail for large tuples (short integer overflow)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2491: Summary: Recovery fail for large tuples (short integer overflow) (was:

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2491) Recovery fail for large tuples (short overflow)

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2491: --- Summary: Recovery fail for large tuples (short overflow) Key: ASTERIXDB-2491 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2491 Project: Apache

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2480) JSON Parser failed at NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16684496#comment-16684496 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2480: - The issue is that the GenericRecord#size()

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-2422) Introduce compressed storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-2422. - Resolution: Fixed > Introduce compressed storage >

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-2464) createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not unregister the file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-2464. - Resolution: Fixed > createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-2464) createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not unregister the file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet reassigned ASTERIXDB-2464: --- Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet > createFile() followed by deleteFile() will

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2464) createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not unregister the file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2464: Description: In

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2464) createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not unregister the file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2464: Description: In

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2464) createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not unregister the file

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2464: --- Summary: createFile() followed by deleteFile() will not unregister the file Key: ASTERIXDB-2464 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2464

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2422) Introduce compressed storage

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2422: --- Summary: Introduce compressed storage Key: ASTERIXDB-2422 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2422 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2414) FileManager throws file is already mapped on create

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16551151#comment-16551151 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2414: - Reproducer: In LSMHarness: - LSMHarness

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2414) FileManager throws file is already mapped on create

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2414: --- Summary: FileManager throws file is already mapped on create Key: ASTERIXDB-2414 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2414 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2331) Plan branch repeated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16401189#comment-16401189 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2331: - Got it :) I was confused .. sorry about

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2331) Plan branch repeated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398005#comment-16398005 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2331: - The issue disappeared after set noindexonly

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2331) Plan branch repeated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2331: Description: I didn't investigate. But it looks like unmaintained Split output.

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2331) Plan branch repeated

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2331: --- Summary: Plan branch repeated Key: ASTERIXDB-2331 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2331 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue

[jira] [Closed] (ASTERIXDB-1334) [IndexOutOfBoundsException/ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException] Malformed records' offset and length on nested ADM types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet closed ASTERIXDB-1334. --- > [IndexOutOfBoundsException/ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException] Malformed records' >

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1334) [IndexOutOfBoundsException/ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException] Malformed records' offset and length on nested ADM types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16384845#comment-16384845 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1334: - Yes we can. >

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2309) ComponentId failed during redo

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2309: --- Summary: ComponentId failed during redo Key: ASTERIXDB-2309 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2309 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-2257) Ansible 2.4 throws syntax error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16334844#comment-16334844 ] Wail Alkowaileet edited comment on ASTERIXDB-2257 at 1/22/18 8:30 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2257) Ansible 2.4 throws syntax error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16334844#comment-16334844 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2257: - Yes ... It worked after downgrading to

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2253) Disjunctive predicts on the same fields introduces join

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2253: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Disjunctive predicts on the same fields

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2257) Ansible 2.4 throws syntax error

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2257: --- Summary: Ansible 2.4 throws syntax error Key: ASTERIXDB-2257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2257 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-2233) Common conjunctions in disjunctions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet reassigned ASTERIXDB-2233: --- Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet > Common conjunctions in disjunctions >

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2253) Disjunctive predicts on the same fields introduces join

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16332819#comment-16332819 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2253: - I agree... Also I found it's needed to 

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2253) Disjunctive predicts on the same fields introduces join

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-2253: Component/s: COMP - Compiler > Disjunctive predicts on the same fields

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2254) Recognize common commutative expressions

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2254: --- Summary: Recognize common commutative expressions Key: ASTERIXDB-2254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2254 Project: Apache

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2253) Disjunctive predicts on the same fields introduces join

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2253: --- Summary: Disjunctive predicts on the same fields introduces join Key: ASTERIXDB-2253 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2253 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2218) Enforcement of a secondary index does not work.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16315533#comment-16315533 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2218: - For the closed-type, both the primary index

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2233) Common conjunctions in disjunctions

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2233: --- Summary: Common conjunctions in disjunctions Key: ASTERIXDB-2233 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2233 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2221) EquiJoin condition propagation for constant values

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2221: --- Summary: EquiJoin condition propagation for constant values Key: ASTERIXDB-2221 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2221 Project:

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2220) Resolve nested key expression

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2220: --- Summary: Resolve nested key expression Key: ASTERIXDB-2220 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2220 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2217) deep_equal throws ClassCastException

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2217: --- Summary: deep_equal throws ClassCastException Key: ASTERIXDB-2217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2217 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2199) Nested primary key and hash repartitioning bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16306655#comment-16306655 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2199: - Yes, similar to the issue in this JIRA.

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2199) Nested primary key and hash repartitioning bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305941#comment-16305941 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2199: - [~dtabass] It's a different issue as Steven

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2199) Nested primary key and hash repartitioning bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305872#comment-16305872 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2199: - Will look into it.. Thanks! > Nested

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2199) Nested primary key and hash repartitioning bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16304360#comment-16304360 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-2199: - I noticed the same issue... I think the

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2191) Constant folding for nested Scalar Functions

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2191: --- Summary: Constant folding for nested Scalar Functions Key: ASTERIXDB-2191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2191 Project: Apache

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2189) AbstractListBuilder.reset() creates unnecessary objects

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2189: --- Summary: AbstractListBuilder.reset() creates unnecessary objects Key: ASTERIXDB-2189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2189 Project:

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2041) AQL QueryServiceServlet returns wrong URL handle

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-2041: --- Summary: AQL QueryServiceServlet returns wrong URL handle Key: ASTERIXDB-2041 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2041 Project: Apache

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1885) Printer: Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974198#comment-15974198 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1885: - (2) is definitely not valid. For (1), I

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1885) Printer: Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1885: Description: I got a problem when dealing with closed objects/records that

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1885) Printer: Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1885: Description: I got a problem when dealing with closed objects/records that

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1885) Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1885: Component/s: AsterixDB > Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1885) Printer: Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1885: Summary: Printer: Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields (was:

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1885) Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1885: --- Summary: Malformed result in closed object with MISSING fields Key: ASTERIXDB-1885 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1885 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1843) Builtin functions documentation have wrong name and signature for AQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1843: Summary: Builtin functions documentation have wrong name and signature for AQL

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1843) Builtin functions documentation have wrong name and signature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1843: Component/s: Documentation > Builtin functions documentation have wrong name

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1844) Add START FEED statement

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1844: --- Summary: Add START FEED statement Key: ASTERIXDB-1844 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1844 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1843) Builtin functions documentation have wrong name and signature

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1843: --- Summary: Builtin functions documentation have wrong name and signature Key: ASTERIXDB-1843 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1843

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1369) Add the Java driver for Asterix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15864692#comment-15864692 ] Wail Alkowaileet edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1369 at 2/13/17 11:42 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1369) Add the Java driver for Asterix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15864692#comment-15864692 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1369: - Do we have any expectation for what should

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1705) Requesting unexisted handle stops Query API.

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1705: --- Summary: Requesting unexisted handle stops Query API. Key: ASTERIXDB-1705 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1705 Project: Apache

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1698) Secondary index doesn't follow the compaction policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15588022#comment-15588022 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1698: - I had a discussion with Sattam about this.

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1694) Fail running Tweet Feed on Cluster of 16 nodes (while succeed on 4 nodes)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15576516#comment-15576516 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1694: - After a long meeting, Mingda and I located

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1684) Unify accessing and processing records.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1684: Description: Currently, we have more that 5 classes to deal with serialized

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1684) Unify accessing and processing records.

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1684: --- Summary: Unify accessing and processing records. Key: ASTERIXDB-1684 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1684 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1670) Java heap exceeded - COUNT(for $x in dataset Tweets return $x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15554323#comment-15554323 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1670: - I couldn't reproduce this issue again for

[jira] [Closed] (ASTERIXDB-1670) Java heap exceeded - COUNT(for $x in dataset Tweets return $x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet closed ASTERIXDB-1670. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > Java heap exceeded - COUNT(for $x in dataset Tweets

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1673) ARecordCaster potential object creation problem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1673: Priority: Trivial (was: Major) I changed it into Trivial because this should

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1673) ARecordCaster potential object creation problem

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1673: --- Summary: ARecordCaster potential object creation problem Key: ASTERIXDB-1673 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1673 Project: Apache

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1649) Read async query result more than once.

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1649: --- Summary: Read async query result more than once. Key: ASTERIXDB-1649 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1649 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1414) Insert tweets with existed keys

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15489870#comment-15489870 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1414: - Actually that feature is one of the best

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1641) Hit HYR002 exception when query a large dataset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15489836#comment-15489836 ] Wail Alkowaileet edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1641 at 9/14/16 8:44 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1641) Hit HYR002 exception when query a large dataset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15489836#comment-15489836 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1641: - Probably then it's not the ResultSweepr

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1641) Hit HYR002 exception when query a large dataset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484913#comment-15484913 ] Wail Alkowaileet edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1641 at 9/12/16 6:41 PM:

[jira] [Resolved] (ASTERIXDB-1334) [IndexOutOfBoundsException/ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException] Malformed records' offset and length on nested ADM types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet resolved ASTERIXDB-1334. - Resolution: Fixed >

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-1627) create-polygon() from array of double is giving wrong numbers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet reassigned ASTERIXDB-1627: --- Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet > create-polygon() from array of double is

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1641) Hit HYR002 exception when query a large dataset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484085#comment-15484085 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1641: - Did you submit the query asynchronously or

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1334) [IndexOutOfBoundsException/ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException] Malformed records' offset and length on nested ADM types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484069#comment-15484069 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1334: - I created synthetic data that reproduce the

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1334) [IndexOutOfBoundsException/ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException] Malformed records' offset and length on nested ADM types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15483126#comment-15483126 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1334: - I wanted to add the same dataset ... but I

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1616) NPE when printing record inside open type with unicode fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15482171#comment-15482171 ] Wail Alkowaileet edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1616 at 9/11/16 6:30 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1616) NPE when printing record inside open type with unicode fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15482171#comment-15482171 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1616: - Hi Ian, I apologies for hijacking this ...

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1627) create-polygon() from array of double is giving wrong numbers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15457874#comment-15457874 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1627: - I suspect this bug is related to:

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1627) create-polygon() from array of double is giving wrong numbers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1627: Description: Hi, Data:

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1627) create-polygon() from array of double is giving wrong numbers

Wail Alkowaileet created ASTERIXDB-1627: --- Summary: create-polygon() from array of double is giving wrong numbers Key: ASTERIXDB-1627 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1627

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1616) NPE when printing record inside open type with unicode fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15457826#comment-15457826 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1616: - Hi Ian, Unfortunately, I tried to see

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1616) NPE when printing record inside open type with unicode fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15451212#comment-15451212 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1616: - The problem occurs with variable length

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1616) NPE when printing record inside open type with unicode fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15449724#comment-15449724 ] Wail Alkowaileet edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1616 at 8/30/16 6:18 PM:

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1609) TwitterParser does not parse closed-nullable fields.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wail Alkowaileet updated ASTERIXDB-1609: Summary: TwitterParser does not parse closed-nullable fields. (was:

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1609) TwitterParser does parse closed-nullable fields.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439529#comment-15439529 ] Wail Alkowaileet commented on ASTERIXDB-1609: - I have another question: Why parsing the

  1   2   >