[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16506805#comment-16506805
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ASTERIXDB-2399:
------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 3fd1f2361e98b273859a13a58b8922895f4ef751 in asterixdb's branch 
refs/heads/master from Till Westmann
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=asterixdb.git;h=3fd1f23 ]

[ASTERIXDB-2399][SQL][FUN] Rename COLL_ aggregate functions

Rename to COLL_ functions to use the prefix STRICT_ to reduce the
confusion about which functions implement a strict NULL handling.

Change-Id: I5c103dbe7fa42bf5c4e2bfa53592b2041084aa8f
Reviewed-on: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/2691
Sonar-Qube: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Tested-by: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Contrib: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Integration-Tests: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Lychagin <dmitry.lycha...@couchbase.com>


> Rename COLL_* aggregate functions into STRICT_*
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-2399
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2399
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: *DB - AsterixDB, DOC - Documentation, FUN - Functions, 
> SQL - Translator SQL++
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.3
>            Reporter: Till
>            Assignee: Till
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.9.4
>
>
> There are 2 kinds of aggregation functions in SQL++ right now:
> # those with the prefix ARRAY_ (which share SQL's behavior or ignoring NULL) 
> and
> # those with the prefix COLL_ (which return NULL, if one of the values is 
> NULL).
> To reduce the confusion about which functions implement a strict NULL 
> handling we should rename to COLL_ functions to use the prefix STRICT_ 
> instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to