[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed, in both inverted index and rtree

2017-11-08 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244307#comment-16244307 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-2156: --- I should be mentioned that, in the current master we will

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed

2017-11-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16243340#comment-16243340 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-2156: --- Ok, thanks. That would be great! > Encounter error during feed

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed, in both inverted index and rtree

2017-11-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2156: -- Summary: Encounter error during feed, in both inverted index and rtree (was: Encounter error

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed

2017-11-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2156: -- Description: Hi, all When we try cloudberry recently, we encounter the following error when we use

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed

2017-11-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16242471#comment-16242471 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-2156: --- Ok, thank you. Actually, before 20 days ago, that process

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed

2017-11-06 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2156: -- Description: Hi, all When we try cloudberry recently, we encounter the following error when we use

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2156) Encounter error during feed

2017-11-06 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-2156: - Summary: Encounter error during feed Key: ASTERIXDB-2156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2156 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2116) Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema.

2017-09-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2116: -- Description: When we apply several modified TPCH queries to the nested schema of AsterixDB, we get

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2116) Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema.

2017-09-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2116: -- Description: When we apply several modified TPCH queries to the nested schema of AsterixDB, we get

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2116) Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema.

2017-09-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2116: -- Description: When we apply several modified TPCH queries to the nested schema of AsterixDB, we get

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2116) Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema.

2017-09-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2116: -- Description: When we apply several modified TPCH queries to the nested schema of AsterixDB, we get

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-2116) Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema.

2017-09-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-2116: -- Description: When we apply several modified TPCH queries to the nested schema of AsterixDB, we get

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-2116) Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema.

2017-09-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-2116: - Summary: Very different efficiency behavior on Nested Schema. Key: ASTERIXDB-2116 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2116 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1892) A similarity join fails with "Failed to insert a new buffer into the aggregate operator! [HyracksDataException]" exception.

2017-04-23 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15980316#comment-15980316 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1892: --- As for the issue case itself, actually, "$p.asin /* +indexnl */

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1852) Nested function poses wrong nested loop plan.

2017-03-23 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1852: -- Description: In a binary join query, the optimizer should generate a hash join plan. Due to the

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1852) Nested function poses wrong nested loop plan.

2017-03-23 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1852: - Summary: Nested function poses wrong nested loop plan. Key: ASTERIXDB-1852 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1852 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1839) Subquery de-correlation problem.

2017-03-13 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1839: - Summary: Subquery de-correlation problem. Key: ASTERIXDB-1839 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1839 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1813) similarity-jaccard-prefix() issue

2017-03-05 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15896273#comment-15896273 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1813: --- Refer to patch https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1076/. >

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-1813) similarity-jaccard-prefix() issue

2017-02-27 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai reassigned ASTERIXDB-1813: - Assignee: Wenhai > similarity-jaccard-prefix() issue > - > >

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1811) RuntimeTest got feed error.

2017-02-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1811: - Summary: RuntimeTest got feed error. Key: ASTERIXDB-1811 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1811 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-1811) RuntimeTest got feed error.

2017-02-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai reassigned ASTERIXDB-1811: - Assignee: Xikui Wang > RuntimeTest got feed error. > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1776) Data loss in many multi-partitions

2017-02-02 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15849649#comment-15849649 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1776: --- Still, if we want use up the resources, we can configure 8

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1776) Data loss in many multi-partitions

2017-02-02 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15849643#comment-15849643 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1776: --- lwh@node071:~/asterixdb> lwh@node071:~/asterixdb> while true;

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1776) Data loss in many multi-partitions

2017-02-02 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15849640#comment-15849640 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1776: --- Another question, after we stop an instance, we get some idle

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1776) Data loss in many multi-partitions

2017-02-02 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15849637#comment-15849637 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1776: --- Ok, it means we can only set the partitions/iodevices less than

[jira] (ASTERIXDB-1777) Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory.

2017-01-31 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Wenhai updated an issue

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1777) Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory.

2017-01-28 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1777: -- Description: Till now, we ensued that two cases should consider caching the frames in the memory

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1777) Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory.

2017-01-28 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1777: -- Description: Till now, we ensued that two cases should consider caching the frames in the memory

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1777) Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory.

2017-01-28 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1777: -- Description: Till now, we ensued that two cases should consider caching the frames in the memory

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1777) Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory.

2017-01-28 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1777: -- Description: Till now, we ensued that two cases should consider caching the frames in the memory

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1777) Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory.

2017-01-28 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1777: - Summary: Budget does not consider the runfile frame that should be temporarily cached in massive memory. Key: ASTERIXDB-1777 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1777

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1776) Data loss in many multi-partitions

2017-01-28 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1776: - Summary: Data loss in many multi-partitions Key: ASTERIXDB-1776 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1776 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1724) Unexpected exception in ExecutionTest

2016-11-01 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1724: -- Description: Hi, all Yestoday, after I applying the latest master onto the branch. I got a series

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1724) Unexpected exception in ExecutionTest

2016-11-01 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1724: - Summary: Unexpected exception in ExecutionTest Key: ASTERIXDB-1724 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1724 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1718) Condition expression propagation in general cases.

2016-10-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1718: -- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Condition expression propagation in general cases. >

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1718) Condition expression propagation in general cases.

2016-10-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1718: - Summary: Condition expression propagation in general cases. Key: ASTERIXDB-1718 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1718 Project: Apache AsterixDB

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601164#comment-15601164 ] Wenhai edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1704 at 10/24/16 1:22 PM: - Ok, then I

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601164#comment-15601164 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1704: --- Ok, then I guess your slow down is not a real "SLOW DOWN",

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601139#comment-15601139 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1704: --- What I did is just applying the fuzzy branch onto the master,

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-22 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599076#comment-15599076 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1704: --- BTW, I noticed the fuzzyjoin branch on the latest master is 6

[jira] [Closed] (ASTERIXDB-1683) About the test issues.

2016-10-22 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai closed ASTERIXDB-1683. - Resolution: Information Provided Just rerunning the executionTest with compiling package in mvn and

[jira] [Closed] (ASTERIXDB-1682) About the test issues.

2016-10-22 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai closed ASTERIXDB-1682. - Resolution: Information Provided > About the test issues. > -- > >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-22 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599024#comment-15599024 ] Wenhai edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1704 at 10/23/16 4:26 AM: - How many

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-22 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599029#comment-15599029 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1704: --- Please also care about the IO characters during the running

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1704) Fuzzy-join query is slow

2016-10-22 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599024#comment-15599024 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1704: --- How many partitions did you configured? How about the running

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1686) Optimized plan doesn't converge

2016-10-10 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1686: -- Description: The query plan seems not converge in the current rule collections. Operation We

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1686) Optimized plan doesn't converge

2016-10-10 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1686: - Summary: Optimized plan doesn't converge Key: ASTERIXDB-1686 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1686 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1683) About the test issues.

2016-10-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1683: -- Description: Hi, all. I am really confusing about the junit tests. Even I have tried many many ...

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1682) About the test issues.

2016-10-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1682: -- Description: Hi, all. I am really confusing about the junit tests. Even I have tried many many ...

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1683) About the test issues.

2016-10-07 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15554360#comment-15554360 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1683: --- It is git version 1.8.5.2 (Apple Git-48). Have we changed onto

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1683) About the test issues.

2016-10-06 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1683: - Summary: About the test issues. Key: ASTERIXDB-1683 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1683 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1682) About the test issues.

2016-10-06 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1682: - Summary: About the test issues. Key: ASTERIXDB-1682 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1682 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Closed] (ASTERIXDB-1412) Batch import errors

2016-09-26 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai closed ASTERIXDB-1412. - Resolution: Fixed Also a byproduct of the utf8 issue. It has been verified with the same environment

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1412) Batch import errors

2016-09-26 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523194#comment-15523194 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1412: --- Commit 58dfdc99aa7f0f292be5a59b922148e517c8ce3e in asterixdb's

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1655) Making AQL keyword case-insenstive

2016-09-23 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15516959#comment-15516959 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1655: --- Yep, It's real a problem. We always got inconsistent results

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1478) using localfs goes wrong

2016-08-12 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418911#comment-15418911 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1478: --- Thanks, Till. After he switching the iodevices, the error still

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1566) UTF8 got wrong when processing chinese char and beyond

2016-08-05 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409873#comment-15409873 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1566: --- Ok, thanks. It's a fast answer. :) > UTF8 got wrong when

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1478) using localfs goes wrong

2016-08-05 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409569#comment-15409569 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1478: --- Hi, Till. is the dir setting critical for this issue? > using

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: (was: 3wayjoinplan.rtf) > Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: (was: 3wayjoin.rtf) > Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception. >

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: (was: 3wayjoin.pdf) > Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception. >

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: (was: 2wayjoin.rtf) > Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception. >

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: (was: 2wayjoinplan.rtf) > Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: (was: 2wayjoin.pdf) > Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception. >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15399664#comment-15399664 ] Wenhai edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1556 at 7/29/16 5:18 PM: {noformat}

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15399664#comment-15399664 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1556: --- {noformat} drop dataverse fuzzyjointest if exists; create

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1556: -- Attachment: 3wayjoin.pdf 3wayjoinplan.rtf 2wayjoin.pdf

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1556) Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.

2016-07-29 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15399635#comment-15399635 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1556: --- Attached the asterix plan, hyracks plan as well as the

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1546) Exceptions thrown after launching AsterixHyracksIntegrationUtil.java

2016-07-25 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391767#comment-15391767 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1546: --- have you recompiled the eclipse:eclipse with mvn? > Exceptions

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ASTERIXDB-1545) AsterixDB should support the OGC standard

2016-07-25 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391496#comment-15391496 ] Wenhai edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1545 at 7/25/16 7:58 AM: Cann't agree

[jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1544) Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index

2016-07-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391382#comment-15391382 ] Wenhai commented on ASTERIXDB-1544: --- Done. > Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index >

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1544) Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index

2016-07-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1544: -- Description: In the current master, we have NO testCases covering the fuzzyjoin on the (inverted)

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1544) Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index

2016-07-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1544: -- Description: In the current master, we have NO testCases covering the fuzzyjoin on the (inverted)

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-1544) Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index

2016-07-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai reassigned ASTERIXDB-1544: - Assignee: Wenhai > Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index >

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1544) Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index

2016-07-24 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1544: - Summary: Omit the fuzzyjoin on inverted index Key: ASTERIXDB-1544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1544 Project: Apache AsterixDB Issue Type:

[jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-1487) Fuzzy select-join on inverted index poses inconsistent results.

2016-07-15 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai reassigned ASTERIXDB-1487: - Assignee: Wenhai > Fuzzy select-join on inverted index poses inconsistent results. >

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1487) Fuzzy select-join on inverted index poses inconsistent results.

2016-06-17 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1487: -- Attachment: csx-small-multi-id.txt dblp-small-multi-id.txt > Fuzzy select-join on

[jira] [Created] (ASTERIXDB-1487) Fuzzy select-join on inverted index poses inconsistent results.

2016-06-17 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
Wenhai created ASTERIXDB-1487: - Summary: Fuzzy select-join on inverted index poses inconsistent results. Key: ASTERIXDB-1487 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1487 Project: Apache

[jira] [Updated] (ASTERIXDB-1478) using localfs goes wrong

2016-06-10 Thread Wenhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wenhai updated ASTERIXDB-1478: -- Description: I load data file using localfs but AsterixDB keeps running for a long long