[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596670#comment-15596670
]
Chen Li commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
Glad to know issue 1) is fixed.
> edit-distance-check on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15593861#comment-15593861
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15592566#comment-15592566
]
Taewoo Kim commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
---
In summary, there are two issues:
1) the same type of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15592330#comment-15592330
]
Taewoo Kim commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
---
A 2-gram index on the search predicate field can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15590865#comment-15590865
]
Taewoo Kim commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
---
Yes. It runs well. It took me some time to reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15590893#comment-15590893
]
Chen Li commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
Why does the plan use both indexes? One of them is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15590529#comment-15590529
]
Taewoo Kim commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
---
Another issue: I think conducting the 2-gram index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15590756#comment-15590756
]
Jianfeng Jia commented on ASTERIXDB-1700:
-
did you try to use 2-gram only and the 3-gram only