rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1518664205
leaving branch alive as I squashed the history when I merged. some of the
commits might be useful for understanding nascent project history.
--
This is an automated message from the
rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1517689907
@nickva thank you for the detailed review, I've pushed a commit with fixes
for pretty much all of it. It helped find a silly error in _nouveau_analyze
(the core of it worked, I somehow
rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1517681072
the 'expectation_failed' I think is because some tests run so quickly that
the new dbname for the next test is the same. I suspect its a timestamp?
--
This is an automated message from
rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1489996648
on sort order, yes, you can sort on one or more fields (string or number) in
ascending or descending order, the same as dreyfus. Unlike dreyfus, nouveau
uses couch_ejson_compare when
rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1485747436
* Nouveau endpoints return 404 if disabled and no attempt is made by the
nouveau erlang app to contact the JVM side for background indexing.
* update=true|false is supported but
rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1341152139
API choices.
Currently you can define a nouveau index almost identically to clouseau, the
`index()` function behaves the same way, you just need to use "nouveau" as a
top-level
rnewson commented on PR #4291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/4291#issuecomment-1341144819
@big-r81 they worked in the original repo when they are at the root. good
call, though. we either need to adjust them so they work here or remove them.
haven't thought much about it.
