wohali commented on issue #1125: Very slow replication for some of databases
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1125#issuecomment-362322333
@sergey-safarov please follow apache/couchdb#745, this is likely a known
issue with replication of documents with attachments.
wohali commented on issue #65: Improve README for configuration changes, closes
#47
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/pull/65#issuecomment-362336147
@chriswiggins sadly, no: ["Further, the source of a bind mount must be a
local directory, not a
wohali commented on issue #666: Move _users _design/auth into Erlang
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/666#issuecomment-362341539
@abc3 can you open a pull request for this please? Your patch got lost :)
This is
wohali closed issue #1138: Different replication recovery scenarios
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1138
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
wohali commented on issue #1138: Different replication recovery scenarios
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1138#issuecomment-362321423
This is not a bug report.
In the future, please take these sorts of requests to our IRC/Slack channel,
or to our user mailing list.
wohali commented on issue #1137: Execution of queries takes a lot of time
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1137#issuecomment-362320636
Changing a design document (the definition of a "map" or a "reduce") will
force a recalculation of the index on the next time you access that
wohali closed issue #1137: Execution of queries takes a lot of time
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1137
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub
wohali commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362327942
For others, so you don't have to sign up for a JIRA account, here's the text
(2600/teletype):
> On debian 8.6 ander openvz container fax attachment cannot
wohali commented on issue #65: Improve README for configuration changes, closes
#47
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/pull/65#issuecomment-362336391
Looks like as long as you're not on Windows, you can bind-mount a single
file. I'll update.
Any other comments?
wohali commented on issue #65: Improve README for configuration changes, closes
#47
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/pull/65#issuecomment-362336147
@chriswiggins sadly, no: ["Further, the source of a bind mount must be a
local directory, not a
wohali commented on issue #1106: CouchDB 2.1.1: errors on startup "Error
opening view group `_auth`"
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1106#issuecomment-362334698
Try replicating the `_users` database to another database.
If this works, you could try scheduling a
wohali commented on issue #1097: CouchDB 2.1.1: Compaction daemon - unable to
calculate free space for `/run/user/0`: `enoent`
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1097#issuecomment-362329750
Can you let us know how much RAM all of your CouchDB-related processes are
consuming?
sanchezl opened a new issue #66: Support for ppc64le and s390x?
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/issues/66
## Expected Behavior
`docker pull couchdb` on `ppc64le` or `s390x` should work.
## Current Behavior
Only `amd64` images are available.
## Possible
wohali closed issue #53: Use a fixed uid and gid
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/issues/53
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
abc3 commented on issue #666: Move _users _design/auth into Erlang
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/666#issuecomment-362427019
Yes, sure.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
wohali commented on issue #66: Support for ppc64le and s390x?
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/issues/66#issuecomment-362406425
Hi @sanchezl , thanks for your interest.
A prerequisite for any sort of released Docker image is that Apache CouchDB
can consistently run, and
wohali closed issue #66: Support for ppc64le and s390x?
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/issues/66
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and
wohali commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362410116
It's not about the speed of the disk, it's about the *latency* of disk
operations from inside of the Docker image.
Your log shows that, on occasion, the
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362399706
Hello @wohali
About slow disk. Docker files located at RAID10 disk created from 6 SATA
disk.
Short test demonstrate that used partitions is not
jjrodrig opened a new pull request #1139: Fix for issue #1136 - Error 500
deleting DB without quorum
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1139
## Overview
The current behaviour for database deletion in a cluster is:
- Database deletion returns 404 - Not found if all
wohali opened a new issue #67: Provide and publish s390x images
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/issues/67
A couple of requests have come in for `s390x` images, see #66 for instance.
This is blocked until:
* outstanding issues with CouchDB on `s390x` are resolved,
wohali closed pull request #64: Use 5984:5984 as couchdb uid:gid, closes #53
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/pull/64
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
wohali opened a new issue #68: Provide and publish ppc64le images
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-docker/issues/68
A few requests have come in for `ppc64le` images, see #66, #60, etc.
This is blocked until:
* Jenkins CI is updated to include an `ppc64le` build target,
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362465655
Joan (@wohali) on provided link is not used volumes and used disk image via
loopback + docker filesystem overlay. Your example is not applicable to this
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362465655
Joan (@wohali) on provided link is not used volumes and used disk image via
loopback + docker filesystem overlay. Your example is not applicable to this
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362469041
Joan (@wohali) my mistake. Link you provided is applicable.
I will made additional test
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362465655
Joan (@wohali) on provided link is not used volumes and used disk image via
loopback + docker filesystem overlay. You example is not applicable to this
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362504677
Joan (@wohali)
First i measured disk io operation when `tmpfs` mounted as volume inside
container.
```
[root@node0 ~]# docker run --rm
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362504677
Joan (@wohali)
First i measured disk io operation when `tmpfs` mounted as volume inside
container.
```
[root@c0ed791b0e7d /]# rm -f /workspace/*
sergey-safarov commented on issue #1119: Could not open shard
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1119#issuecomment-362504677
Joan (@wohali)
First i measured disk io operation when `tmpfs` mounted as volume inside
container.
```
[root@node0 ~]# docker run --rm
PascalPuchtler opened a new issue #1137: Execution of queries takes a lot of
time
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1137
In my database I like to run requests data over a view. After the Request
the database takes a long time to update the index, but the index has no
changes.
sajeeval opened a new issue #1138: Different replication recovery scenarios
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1138
Hello,
I just want to understand the difference of replication recovery mechanism
(Unidirectional) for following two scenarios.
1. Replication
32 matches
Mail list logo
