[GitHub] garrensmith closed issue #973: Order changes in replication view, if you click on an action

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
garrensmith closed issue #973: Order changes in replication view, if you click on an action URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/issues/973 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] harald-d commented on issue #978: Creating a 2-node cluster with couchdb 2.1 never works

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
harald-d commented on issue #978: Creating a 2-node cluster with couchdb 2.1 never works URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/978#issuecomment-343833024 Hello Joan, I can't thank you enough - changing the name in vm.args did the trick, now the cluster seems to work.

[Jenkins] FAILURE: CouchDB » master #138

2017-11-12 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Boo, we failed. https://builds.apache.org/job/CouchDB/job/master/138/

[Jenkins] SUCCESS: CouchDB » 2.1.x #11

2017-11-12 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Yay, we passed. https://builds.apache.org/job/CouchDB/job/2.1.x/11/

[GitHub] wohali closed pull request #987: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali closed pull request #987: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/987 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[Jenkins] FAILURE: CouchDB » master #137

2017-11-12 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Boo, we failed. https://builds.apache.org/job/CouchDB/job/master/137/

[GitHub] wohali opened a new pull request #987: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali opened a new pull request #987: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/987 See https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/986 This is an automated message

[GitHub] wohali closed pull request #986: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali closed pull request #986: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/986 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #986: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #986: Revert to ubuntu Jenkins label, uids now standardised URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/986#issuecomment-343771782 ``` 17:01 <+jan_> Wohali: I think you?re the only one who can reasonably review this, feel free to

[Jenkins] SUCCESS: CouchDB » jenkins-new-label #2

2017-11-12 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Yay, we passed. https://builds.apache.org/job/CouchDB/job/jenkins-new-label/2/

[GitHub] janl commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
janl commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343766547 @ondra-novak Vice President of Apache CouchDB here. Formal notice to check your attitude and wording. I?m not seeing a language

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343764159 Thank you very much. If you need help, testing, investigating etc, please let me know.

[GitHub] rnewson commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
rnewson commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343763630 It's probably a bug, yes. we'll look into it. (there's no such as bugfree code, and couchdb has been production 'ready' for many

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343763659 Locking this ticket to public updates. This is an automated

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343763659 Locking this ticket to updates. This is an automated message from

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343763553 I feel that you only just trivialize the bug, or trying to play a game "the bug is on your side" no, you have a bug in

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343762498 Thank you @rnewson. @ondra-novak Insulting the project you're asking for help from isn't going to get this resolved any

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/914#issuecomment-343762644 We know this change is frustrating for your specific use case, but there is a good reason for this change. Again,

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343762498 Thank you @rnewson. @ondra-novak Insulting the project you're asking for help from isn't going to get this resolved any

[GitHub] rnewson commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
rnewson commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343760312 I can't immediately think why the seq wouldn't be preserved across view compaction. I'm testing locally now.

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343759935 > Also for reference, please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2849 which discusses why this is a problematic

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343758719 What is purpose of update_seq for the view? Has it some meaningful use? Till 1.6. it was good reference to find offset

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343758719 What is purpose of update_seq for the view? Has it some meaningful use? Till 1.6. it was good reference to find offset

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343758719 What is purpose of update_seq for the view? Has it some meaningful use? Until 1.6. it was good reference to find offset

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343758135 I don't understand, my english is not good. Is this really WAI? $ curl -s

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343758010 Also for reference, please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2849 which discusses why this is a problematic

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343757731 Paraphrasing a response that has been given before: The update sequence values in CouchDB are opaque. In CouchDB 1.x, they

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #984: update_seq of a view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984#issuecomment-343757399 Functionality was added back into 2.x with this commit:

[GitHub] wohali commented on issue #981: Feature; is it possible to have collection level above document?

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
wohali commented on issue #981: Feature; is it possible to have collection level above document? URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/981#issuecomment-343755239 This has been requested in the past and is not possible to implement the way you are requesting. A better option

[GitHub] mohshraim commented on issue #981: Feature; is it possible to have collection level above document?

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
mohshraim commented on issue #981: Feature; is it possible to have collection level above document? URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/981#issuecomment-343752488 @wohali Thanks for your reply and links.. I have already read the whole documentation a hundred times last

[GitHub] popojargo commented on issue #973: Order changes in replication view, if you click on an action

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
popojargo commented on issue #973: Order changes in replication view, if you click on an action URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/issues/973#issuecomment-343752560 @garrensmith Fixed with #1019 This is an

[GitHub] mohshraim commented on issue #981: Feature; is it possible to have collection level above document?

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
mohshraim commented on issue #981: Feature; is it possible to have collection level above document? URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/981#issuecomment-343752488 Thanks for your reply and links.. I have already read the whole documentation a hundred times last month,

[GitHub] ondra-novak opened a new issue #985: _changes since=now doesn't send response headers till the first output

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak opened a new issue #985: _changes since=now doesn't send response headers till the first output URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/985 I found this after migration from 1.6. Now to request _changes on the database **since=now** no response headers are returned till

[GitHub] ondra-novak opened a new issue #984: Blocker old bug: update_seq of the view is set to zero after compaction

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak opened a new issue #984: Blocker old bug: update_seq of the view is set to zero after compaction URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/984 After compaction of the view (not _info), update seq is reset to zero. ## Expected Behavior Update_seq ought to

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/914#issuecomment-343728084 OK, so I will need to put some http server there ``` oh boy, please make things more complicated next

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/914#issuecomment-343728084 OK, so I will need to put some http server there ``` oh boy, please make things more complicated later

[GitHub] kxepal commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
kxepal commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/914#issuecomment-343727727 @ondra-novak Suddenly, no - it's a security measurement. However, for 2.x you still can manage os_daemons in runtime by

[GitHub] kxepal commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
kxepal commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/914#issuecomment-343727727 @ondra-novak Suddenly, no - it's a security measurement. However, for 2.x you still can manage os_daemons in runtime by

[GitHub] ondra-novak commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations

2017-11-12 Thread GitBox
ondra-novak commented on issue #914: Blacklist some config sections from HTTP PUT/DELETE operations URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/914#issuecomment-343726379 Is there some way to remove blacklist? I am heavily using os_daemons to start/stop daemons by http