ermouth commented on issue #1620: 1612 fix, js-rewritten PUTs now work
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1620#issuecomment-426337601
@wohali I added small test, but see failed CI. What should I do with this?
Seems CI fails on smth completely unrelated to rewrites.
ermouth commented on issue #1620: 1612 fix, js-rewritten PUTs now work
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1620#issuecomment-424876593
@wohali it’s tested now, but not by CouchDB tests.
There are some tests in CouchDB as well,
ermouth commented on issue #1620: 1612 fix, js-rewritten PUTs now work
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1620#issuecomment-42489
@kxepal Thanks
> Though I forgot reasons to do erlang:get(mochiweb_request_body)
Because rewrites should be fast, as fast as
ermouth commented on issue #1620: 1612 fix, js-rewritten PUTs now work
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1620#issuecomment-42484
@wohali since no +1 so far, may be I could answer questions, if any? Since
js rewrites was initially my patch refactored by @kxepal, I doubt
ermouth commented on issue #1620: 1612 fix, js-rewritten PUTs now work
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1620#issuecomment-423740434
Is it now ok?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
