[jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-347) AggregateCdaProcessor fails with URI is not hierarchical

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519394#comment-14519394 ] Pei Chen commented on CTAKES-347: - I can recreate this with the 3.2.1 binary distribution.

[jira] [Assigned] (CTAKES-347) AggregateCdaProcessor fails with URI is not hierarchical

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pei Chen reassigned CTAKES-347: --- Assignee: Pei Chen AggregateCdaProcessor fails with URI is not hierarchical

[jira] [Resolved] (CTAKES-347) AggregateCdaProcessor fails with URI is not hierarchical

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pei Chen resolved CTAKES-347. - Resolution: Fixed AggregateCdaProcessor fails with URI is not hierarchical

Build failed in Jenkins: ctakes-trunk-compiletest » Apache cTAKES core #664

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ctakes-trunk-compiletest/org.apache.ctakes$ctakes-core/664/changes Changes: [chenpei] CTAKES-347 AggregateCdaProcessor fails with URI is not hierarchical Not sure how widely CDA as input is used. Simplified the config input- reusing uimaFIT style config