[GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on pull request #5537: Bump archunit from 0.12.0 to 0.14.1

2020-09-25 Thread GitBox 


Bill commented on pull request #5537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5537#issuecomment-698631892







This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on pull request #5537: Bump archunit from 0.12.0 to 0.14.1

2020-09-24 Thread GitBox 


Bill commented on pull request #5537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5537#issuecomment-698639378


   whacked another mole



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [geode] Bill commented on pull request #5537: Bump archunit from 0.12.0 to 0.14.1

2020-09-24 Thread GitBox 


Bill commented on pull request #5537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5537#issuecomment-698631892


   I pushed three commits that I think address all the issues @kirklund 
mentioned in comments above.
   
   A better longer-term fix would be to define "layers" for each of our, ahem, 
layers. For now I just added allowances for the annotations package in the 
`geode-commons` "module".



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org