[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16013948#comment-16013948 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-6396: --- This was debated back and forth over several years before we made

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16013870#comment-16013870 ] Jochen Kemnade commented on GROOVY-6396: That depends on whether I'm currently thinking in Stack

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16013861#comment-16013861 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-6396: --- [~jkemnade] would you expect {{LinkedList}} and {{ArrayList}} to

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16013769#comment-16013769 ] Jochen Kemnade commented on GROOVY-6396: Since GROOVY-7937 gives the {{LinkedList}} method

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16013752#comment-16013752 ] Jochen Kemnade commented on GROOVY-6396: I must admin that I'm not a fan of this change. It is a

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15501674#comment-15501674 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-6396: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500245#comment-15500245 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-6396: Github user jwagenleitner commented on a diff in the

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500248#comment-15500248 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-6396: Github user jwagenleitner commented on a diff in the

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500246#comment-15500246 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-6396: Github user jwagenleitner commented on a diff in the

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500247#comment-15500247 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-6396: Github user jwagenleitner commented on a diff in the

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15486801#comment-15486801 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-6396: GitHub user paulk-asert opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-6396) same linkedlist code different behavior between groovy and java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15486438#comment-15486438 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-6396: --- There are two parts to this issue. One is that DGM methods on an