[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143515#comment-16143515 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: I would strongely argue to change the name to e.g. @AutoFinalParams because of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143608#comment-16143608 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-8300 at 8/28/17 10:39 AM: - I suspect we

[GitHub] groovy pull request #374: GROOVY-7569: Use verbose formatting for PowerAsser...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/374 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143608#comment-16143608 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8300: --- I suspect we won't ever introduce that ability to apply to fields

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143631#comment-16143631 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-7569: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8304) Upgrade Apache Ivy from 2.4.0 to a newer version

Aurélien Pupier created GROOVY-8304: --- Summary: Upgrade Apache Ivy from 2.4.0 to a newer version Key: GROOVY-8304 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8304 Project: Groovy

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King updated GROOVY-7569: -- Labels: breaking (was: ) > PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143741#comment-16143741 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7569 at 8/28/17 1:08 PM: Proposed PR

[jira] [Resolved] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King resolved GROOVY-7569. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Paul King Fix Version/s: 2.5.0-beta-2 Proposed PR

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143742#comment-16143742 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-7569: --- This is a breaking change if you were capturing and relying on the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143741#comment-16143741 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7569 at 8/28/17 1:14 PM: Proposed PR

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143741#comment-16143741 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7569 at 8/28/17 1:06 PM: Proposed PR

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143741#comment-16143741 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7569 at 8/28/17 1:13 PM: Proposed PR

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143608#comment-16143608 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-8300 at 8/28/17 12:14 PM: - I suspect we

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8304) Upgrade Apache Ivy from 2.4.0 to a newer version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143750#comment-16143750 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8304: --- Hi Aurélien, I spotted the snapshot zips that the CI server is

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16144525#comment-16144525 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: @synthetic methods/constructors: # Can we be sure that the synthetic code does

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16144530#comment-16144530 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: @What phase should this run at: As early as possible ? > Groovy should have an

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16144530#comment-16144530 ] mg edited comment on GROOVY-8300 at 8/28/17 11:25 PM: -- @What phase should this run

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16144312#comment-16144312 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: I see your side. As as you said, we probably will never have the first two

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16144617#comment-16144617 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-8300: GitHub user paulk-asert opened a pull request:

[GitHub] groovy pull request #594: GROOVY-8300: Initial version sans tests and having...

GitHub user paulk-asert opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/594 GROOVY-8300: Initial version sans tests and having no configuration o… …ptions You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] groovy pull request #595: Groovyc Resource Leaks

GitHub user Persi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/595 Groovyc Resource Leaks Building multiple ant projects in a row within the same JVM sometimes fails on windows with locked jars. This is e.g. the case if two build projects has circle dependencies.

[GitHub] groovy pull request #591: Resource leaks in Groovyc

Github user Persi closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/591 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is