[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-7569) PowerAsserts should print results more verbosely and safer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King updated GROOVY-7569: -- Description: The output of buffer evaluation results in PowerAsserts hides a lot of useful

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-7568) Groovysh output should be more safe, verbose about types and String output

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King updated GROOVY-7568: -- Description: The output of buffer evaluation results in Groovy hides a lot of useful information from

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King updated GROOVY-8300: -- Description: When defined on a method or constructor, all parameters of that method/constructor will

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143369#comment-16143369 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-8300 at 8/28/17 4:57 AM: I tend to agree

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143369#comment-16143369 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8300: --- I tend to agree with your comments. I'll update the description.

[jira] [Resolved] (GROOVY-8303) VerifyError for nested class this call to static method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Wagenleitner resolved GROOVY-8303. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: John Wagenleitner Fix Version/s:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8303) VerifyError for nested class this call to static method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143350#comment-16143350 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-8303: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] groovy pull request #593: GROOVY-8303: VerifyError for nested class this cal...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/593 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8303) VerifyError for nested class this call to static method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143236#comment-16143236 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-8303: GitHub user jwagenleitner opened a pull request:

[GitHub] groovy pull request #593: GROOVY-8303: VerifyError for nested class this cal...

GitHub user jwagenleitner opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/593 GROOVY-8303: VerifyError for nested class this call to static method You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jwagenleitner/groovy

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8303) VerifyError for nested class this call to static method

John Wagenleitner created GROOVY-8303: - Summary: VerifyError for nested class this call to static method Key: GROOVY-8303 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8303 Project: Groovy

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143178#comment-16143178 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: As a side note: A similar result to @AutoFinalParams could also be achieved

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143170#comment-16143170 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: I think method visibility does not need to be taken into consideration because:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143168#comment-16143168 ] mg commented on GROOVY-8300: If e.g. a team decides all fields/properties shall be final by design (forcing

[jira] [Closed] (GROOVY-8302) Delete me

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] mg closed GROOVY-8302. -- Resolution: Invalid > Delete me > - > > Key: GROOVY-8302 > URL:

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8302) Delete me

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] mg updated GROOVY-8302: --- Priority: Trivial (was: Major) Description: (was: This proposal revisits the idea to change the

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8302) break/return/continue support in "Appended Block Closures"

mg created GROOVY-8302: -- Summary: break/return/continue support in "Appended Block Closures" Key: GROOVY-8302 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8302 Project: Groovy Issue Type: Proposal

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8301) break/return/continue support in "Appended Block Closures"

mg created GROOVY-8301: -- Summary: break/return/continue support in "Appended Block Closures" Key: GROOVY-8301 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8301 Project: Groovy Issue Type: Proposal

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King updated GROOVY-8300: -- Description: When defined on a method or constructor, all parameters of that method/constructor will

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8300) Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation

Paul King created GROOVY-8300: - Summary: Groovy should have an @AutoFinal annotation Key: GROOVY-8300 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8300 Project: Groovy Issue Type: New

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8299) Generate bytecode for interface with default and static methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16143032#comment-16143032 ] Daniel Sun commented on GROOVY-8299: If bytecode version > 1.6, IndyStaticTypesMultiTypeDispatcher