[GitHub] [groovy] eric-milles opened a new pull request #1253: GROOVY-9569: check outers and uppers for static fields

eric-milles opened a new pull request #1253: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1253 - use ArrtibuteExpression for outer field - use PropertyExpression for upper field https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9569 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9501

[GitHub] [groovy] paulk-asert commented on pull request #1252: GROOVY-9548: groovydoc: use property modifiers

paulk-asert commented on pull request #1252: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1252#issuecomment-632976322 Merged, thanks! I'll look into the annotations aspect sometime soon and comment on the jira issue. This is

[GitHub] [groovy] asfgit closed pull request #1252: GROOVY-9548: groovydoc: use property modifiers

asfgit closed pull request #1252: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1252 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-9548) groovydoc: properties claim to be "private" and don't show annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114204#comment-17114204 ] Mikko Värri edited comment on GROOVY-9548 at 5/22/20, 4:24 PM: --- Created a

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-9548) groovydoc: properties claim to be "private" and don't show annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114204#comment-17114204 ] Mikko Värri commented on GROOVY-9548: - Created a PR that fixes the visibility modifier.   But

[GitHub] [groovy] vmj opened a new pull request #1252: GROOVY-9548: groovydoc: use property modifiers

vmj opened a new pull request #1252: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1252 The property seems to contain the correct modifiers (public vs private that the field has). Note that this does not fully close the ticket: the property annotations are still not shown.

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-9570) Class-Level Closure Definition With Generics Fails TypeChecked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ian updated GROOVY-9570: Description:     {code:java} import groovy.transform.TypeChecked @TypeChecked abstract class A{ Collection

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-9570) Class-Level Closure Definition With Generics Fails TypeChecked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ian updated GROOVY-9570: Description:     {code:java} import groovy.transform.TypeChecked @TypeChecked abstract class A{ Collection

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-9570) Class-Level Closure Definition With Generics Fails TypeChecked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ian updated GROOVY-9570: Description:     {code:java} import groovy.transform.TypeChecked@TypeChecked abstract class A{ Collection

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-9570) Class-Level Closure Definition With Generics Fails TypeChecked

Ian created GROOVY-9570: --- Summary: Class-Level Closure Definition With Generics Fails TypeChecked Key: GROOVY-9570 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9570 Project: Groovy Issue Type: