[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-11291:
-
Description:
* When rebuiling a Groovy class it often regenerates a large number of class
files that
mgroovy created GROOVY-11291:
Summary: Avoid unnecessarily creating closure class files that
already exist on disk
Key: GROOVY-11291
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11291
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17690823#comment-17690823
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]: I will try to get to this asap, but we are alas pretty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307 ]
mgroovy deleted comment on GROOVY-10307:
--
was (Author: emge):
[~emilles]: The test project which I was finally able to extract from our code
base & posted some time back is of no help in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17690820#comment-17690820
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]: The test project which I was finally able to extract
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17536948#comment-17536948
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~daniel_sun]: No effect, alas:
# 54.633434 s
# 17.132815 s
#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17534262#comment-17534262
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]:
* Just reran the test I have been using internally to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533870#comment-17533870
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~daniel_sun]: What does that analysis tell us in your opinion ? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533866#comment-17533866
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]: Yes, Groovy 3.0.9 Indy exhibited basically the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533529#comment-17533529
]
mgroovy edited comment on GROOVY-10307 at 5/8/22 8:32 PM:
--
[~emilles]:
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533529#comment-17533529
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]:
* Complete test suite took 175 min with the Groovy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533497#comment-17533497
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]:
* I have committed a Groovy 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533487#comment-17533487
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
([~paulk]: No "pointing build to external repo" in our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533368#comment-17533368
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
[~emilles]: This the snapshot I should use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17533302#comment-17533302
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
* Sample code that demonstrates 3x performance degradation between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17492585#comment-17492585
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
* Performance of Groovy 4.0.0 is alas still > 4x slower than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17492542#comment-17492542
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10478:
--
I have extracted what looks like the minimal test case that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 performance degradation test case
(see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 performance degradation test case
(see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 performance degradation test case
(see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 performance degradation test case
* Code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 performance degradation test case
* Code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 performance degradation test case
* Code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Tried to execute my Groovy 3 to Groovy 4 perfromance degradation test case
* Code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Code worked with Groovy 4.0.0-RC1
* However Groovy 4.0.0 throws RTE:
{code:java}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10478:
-
Description:
* Code worked with Groovy 4.0.0-RC1
* However Groovy 4.0.0 throws RTE:
{code:java}
mgroovy created GROOVY-10478:
Summary: Groovy4: java.lang.VerifyError: Bad invokespecial
instruction: interface method reference is in an indirect superinterface.
Key: GROOVY-10478
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17433493#comment-17433493
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
* Groovy 4.0.0-beta-1 looped timings in seconds with
## -Xmx8192m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17433483#comment-17433483
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
* Using
{code}
-Dgroovy.indy.optimize.threshold=2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_4_0_0_b1_loop4_mem.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_4_0_0_b1_loop4_gc.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_3_0_9_mem.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than Groovy 3
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_3_0_9_gc.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than Groovy 3
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17429766#comment-17429766
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
* Attached are screenshots from VisualVM hot spots output for 2nd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17429765#comment-17429765
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10307:
--
* I have picked a suitable looking test (copyDominoDataEmailTest)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_4_0_0_b1_loop2.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_3_0_9_loop2.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than Groovy 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_4_0_0_b1_loop4.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Attachment: groovy_3_0_9_loop4.png
> Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than Groovy 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Description:
Groovy 4.0.0-beta-1 runtime performance in our framework is on average 2 to 3
times
mgroovy created GROOVY-10307:
Summary: Groovy 4 runtime performance on average 2.4x slower than
Groovy 3
Key: GROOVY-10307
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307
Project: Groovy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Description:
Groovy 4.0.0-beta-1 runtime performance in our framework is on average 2 to 3
times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10307:
-
Description:
Groovy 4.0.0-beta-1 runtime performance in our framework is on average 2 to 3
times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy closed GROOVY-10260.
Resolution: Fixed
> Groovy4 CTE: BUG! GStringImpl cannot be cast to class
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420977#comment-17420977
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10260:
--
* I could resolve this on my side, seems it was a collision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420300#comment-17420300
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10261:
--
* That is awesome, thank you man!
> @NamedVariant: Default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420173#comment-17420173
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10260:
--
That's all I got right now, Paul. I have no idea why IntelliJ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10261:
-
Description:
* When using named paramters on an @NamedVariant annotated ctor or method,
default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10261:
-
Description:
* When using named paramters on an @NamedVariant annotated ctor or method,
default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10261:
-
Description:
* When using named paramters on an @NamedVariant annotated ctor or method,
default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10261:
-
Description:
* When using named paramters on an @NamedVariant annotated ctor or method,
default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10261:
-
Description:
* When using named paramters
{code}
import groovy.transform.NamedVariant
import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10261:
-
Environment:
IntelliJ 2021.1.1 x64
AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.11+9
WIN 10
> @NamedVariant: Default parameters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Component/s: Compiler
> Groovy4 CTE: BUG! GStringImpl cannot be cast to class
>
mgroovy created GROOVY-10261:
Summary: @NamedVariant: Default parameters on ctor/method are
ignored when passing some named parameters
Key: GROOVY-10261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10261
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Summary: Groovy4 CTE: BUG! GStringImpl cannot be cast to class
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.Expression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Environment:
IntelliJ 2021.1.1 x64
AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.11+9
WIN 10
> Groovy4: BUG! GStringImpl cannot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Description:
* Just tried to rebuild our Groovy project with IntelliJ 2021.1 from scratch,
and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Description:
* Just tried to rebuild our Groovy project with IntelliJ 2021.1 from scratch,
and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Summary: Groovy4: BUG! GStringImpl cannot be cast to class
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.Expression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Description:
* Just tried to rebuild our Groovy project with IntelliJ 2021.1 from scratch,
and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Description:
* Just tried to rebuild our Groovy project with IntelliJ 2021.1 from scratch,
and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420095#comment-17420095
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10260:
--
* Hi Daniel, just wanted to make sure it is clear it did not work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10260:
-
Summary: Groovy4: Java cross compilation broken ? (was: Groovy4: Java
cross compilation under
mgroovy created GROOVY-10260:
Summary: Groovy4: Java cross compilation under IntelliJ broken ?
Key: GROOVY-10260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10260
Project: Groovy
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420045#comment-17420045
]
mgroovy edited comment on GROOVY-10259 at 9/25/21, 2:07 AM:
* Waiting for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420046#comment-17420046
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10259:
--
* I do see how NameAndValue could be interpreted as being a sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420045#comment-17420045
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10259:
--
* Waiting for more feedback on how people use the macros: How are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420044#comment-17420044
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10259:
--
* NameAndValue is a very small helper class that has 3 goals:
##
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420042#comment-17420042
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10259:
--
* I assume with "functionality that should be core functionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10259:
-
Description:
According to the release notes
([https://groovy-lang.org/releasenotes/groovy-4.0.html])
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420022#comment-17420022
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10259:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420019#comment-17420019
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10259:
--
???
> Groovy4 NV Macros: Rename NV* -> SV*
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10259:
-
Summary: Groovy4 NV Macros: Rename NV* -> SV* (was: Groovy 4 NV Macros:
Rename NV* -> SV*)
> Groovy4
mgroovy created GROOVY-10259:
Summary: Groovy 4 NV Macros: Rename NV* -> SV*
Key: GROOVY-10259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10259
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Proposal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10258:
-
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
> NPE: Pinpoint Exact Location in Call Chain
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10258:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> NPE: Pinpoint Exact Location in Call Chain
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10258:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> NPE: Pinpoint Exact Location in Call Chain
>
mgroovy created GROOVY-10258:
Summary: NPE: Pinpoint Exact Location in Call Chain
Key: GROOVY-10258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10258
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17416890#comment-17416890
]
mgroovy edited comment on GROOVY-10238 at 9/17/21, 7:24 PM:
It only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17416890#comment-17416890
]
mgroovy edited comment on GROOVY-10238 at 9/17/21, 7:23 PM:
It only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17416890#comment-17416890
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-10238:
--
It only occurred in one place in our code and I worked around it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10238:
-
Description:
Another when-the-stars-align-bug:
{code:java}
package org.groovy.groovybugs.v3_0_9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10238:
-
Description:
Another when-the-stars-align-bug ;-)
{code:java}
package org.groovy.groovybugs.v3_0_9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10238:
-
Description:
{code:java}
package org.groovy.groovybugs.v3_0_9
import groovy.transform.Canonical
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-10238:
-
Description:
{code:java}
package org.groovy.groovybugs.v3_0_9
import groovy.transform.Canonical
mgroovy created GROOVY-10238:
Summary: @CompileStatic @Canonical inner class throws RTE:
NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Map.withDefault
Key: GROOVY-10238
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10238
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17414941#comment-17414941
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-8385:
-
I talked to my son, and he has started porting the Minecraft project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17413393#comment-17413393
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-8385:
-
Hi Eric, I'll be honest, I did not expect any progress to be made on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17302644#comment-17302644
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-9971:
-
* @broader picture: Absolutely :)
* @to-String operator: Yes, a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17302580#comment-17302580
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-9971:
-
* You mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17297760#comment-17297760
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-9971:
-
* @If the closure has multiple return statements: If it's doable &
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-9973:
Component/s: Compiler
> @CompileStatic: Binary operation with property throws ClassCastException
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-9973:
Affects Version/s: 3.0.7
> @CompileStatic: Binary operation with property throws ClassCastException
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-9973:
Description:
*Problem*
Build fails when applying a binary operation to a property inside a method,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-9973:
Description:
*Problem*
Build fails when applying a binary operation to a property inside a method,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mgroovy updated GROOVY-9973:
Summary: @CompileStatic: Binary operation with property throws
ClassCastException (was: @CompileStatic:
mgroovy created GROOVY-9973:
---
Summary: @CompileStatic: roovy 3-0-7 Binary operation with
property throws ClassCastException
Key: GROOVY-9973
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9973
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17297530#comment-17297530
]
mgroovy commented on GROOVY-9971:
-
* For the case that the return type of a Closure is deduced to be
mgroovy created GROOVY-9971:
---
Summary: @TypeChecked: Closure no longer compatible with
Closure argument
Key: GROOVY-9971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9971
Project: Groovy
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
