[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2019-01-08 Thread Paul King (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16737810#comment-16737810 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8549: --- The 2_4_X EOL has only been eluded to informally on the dev

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2019-01-08 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16737801#comment-16737801 ] Frederico Costa Galvão commented on GROOVY-8549: Sorry if this seemed urgent on my side:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2019-01-08 Thread Paul King (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16737724#comment-16737724 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8549: --- At present there are no plans to backport the fix or do another

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2019-01-08 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16737650#comment-16737650 ] Frederico Costa Galvão commented on GROOVY-8549: Will this be backported to 2.4.x? >

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-10-11 Thread Paul King (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16646088#comment-16646088 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8549: --- If you don't mind potentially throwing away the zips if the

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-10-11 Thread Jon Kerridge (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16646080#comment-16646080 ] Jon Kerridge commented on GROOVY-8549: -- Paul, Thanks for this notification, once the new versions

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-10-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16645902#comment-16645902 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-8549: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-09-16 Thread Paul King (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16616689#comment-16616689 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8549: --- [~jwagenleitner], the solution in the PR handles a lot of simple

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-09-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16616685#comment-16616685 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-8549: GitHub user paulk-asert opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-04-18 Thread Paul King (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16442151#comment-16442151 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8549: --- For my simplified example above I think my preferred workaround

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-04-17 Thread John Wagenleitner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440952#comment-16440952 ] John Wagenleitner commented on GROOVY-8549: --- Another work-around is to cast the expression to

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8549) Compile Static causes getAt to fail

2018-04-17 Thread Paul King (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440593#comment-16440593 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8549: --- There are other work-arounds. The error goes away if I calculate