[jclouds » jclouds-karaf
#759](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/759/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#39](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/39/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/24#issuecomment-35718196
Ok, the main issue with this PR is solved. We now only have check style issues.
I'll squash the commit and then push.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/24#issuecomment-35719219
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf
#760](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/760/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Niklas Bjoernfot created JCLOUDS-477:
Summary: Add Elastichosts Sydney provider
Key: JCLOUDS-477
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-477
Project: jclouds
Issue Type: New
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+[
+{
+ name:test_obj_1,
/minor - this looks a bit strange
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/79/files#r9966733
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[
+{
+ name:test_container_1,
+ count:2,
+ bytes:78
+},
+{
+name:test_container_2,
+count:1,
+bytes:17
+}
+]
End of file new lines if for more OCD points.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Rackspace Cloud Files US
+
+
+The Rackspace Cloud Files US provider.
+
+Production ready?
+No
There already are cloudfiles providers in jclouds. This needs some more
explanation I think.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.jclouds.rackspace.cloudfiles.us;
+
+import org.jclouds.providers.internal.BaseProviderMetadataTest;
+import
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Rackspace Cloud Files
+==
+
+The Rackspace Cloud Files service.
+
+Production ready?
+No
As above, I would add more explaining here.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I believe the karaf pom.xml is not using the correct checkstyle config -- it
uses the default.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/24#issuecomment-35786008
+ public CDNContainer(String name, boolean enabled, boolean logRetention,
int ttl, URI uri, URI sslUri, URI streamingUri, URI iosUri) {
+ this.name = checkNotNull(name, name required);
+ this.enabled = enabled;
+ this.logRetention = logRetention;
+ this.ttl = ttl;
+
+
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
+import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * @author Jeremy Daggett
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class RegionToCDNEndpoint implements FunctionObject, URI {
+
+ private final SupplierMapString, SupplierURI endpointsSupplier;
+
+
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/2546/
--
Started by an SCM change
Building remotely on s-f854ba64 in workspace
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/ws/
$ sudo /opt/jenkins/sbin/mount-webdav
public interface WriteTo {
/**
* Writes the payload content to the output stream.
*
* @throws IOException
+* @deprecated use Payload.getInput and Guava helpers instead
Done.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #302.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/302
Pushed to 1.7.x.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/302#issuecomment-35789888
@@ -158,9 +158,8 @@ private Blob createUpdatedCopyOfBlobInContainer(String
containerName, Blob in) {
try {
if (payload == null || !(payload instanceof ByteArrayPayload)) {
MutableContentMetadata oldMd =
in.getPayload().getContentMetadata();
-
Closed #301.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/301
Pushed to master.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/301#issuecomment-35789978
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-1.7.x-branch/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/49/
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/2547/changes
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-1.7.x-branch/49/changes
@@ -158,9 +158,8 @@ private Blob createUpdatedCopyOfBlobInContainer(String
containerName, Blob in) {
try {
if (payload == null || !(payload instanceof ByteArrayPayload)) {
MutableContentMetadata oldMd =
in.getPayload().getContentMetadata();
-
Configuring jclouds? Configuration Settings? Configuration Options?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/commit/fccd39703cad2438141dc2eea3aa0a1313306f88#commitcomment-5457633
slogan
How about something like The Java multi-cloud library? Does cloud
interfaces sound a little too abstract to others, too? We see a lot of
developers asking about cloud APIs or cloud providers, but I don't hear the
term cloud interfaces much. If we _do_ want to stick to that theme, how
26 matches
Mail list logo
