See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/869/
[jclouds-pull-requests
#623](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/623/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/303#issuecomment-36221726
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1093](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1093/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/303#issuecomment-36221800
The examples repo has lots and lots and lots of deprecated usage. I'd love to
see recent examples.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/28#issuecomment-36238313
@andrewgaul: Any other changes you'd like to make to this, or ready to merge..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/28#issuecomment-36247992
jclouds » jclouds #869 UNSTABLE
Unrelated [test
Closed #304.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/304
Squashed and committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=a6d5adb69684ae67de814ac1be5f14ca6860b788).
Thanks, @johnbendi!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/304#issuecomment-36250677
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/870/changes
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#196](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/196/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36261531
Finally I had time to finish the genetic TOC. It has room for improvements, but
basically it generates a TOC based on the page headings (h1 to h3, but if you
think having from h4 to h6 too in the TOC is a good idea is a trivial change),
with the appropriate nesting levels.
To use it in a page,
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/chemikadze/jclouds 1.5.x-backports
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/305
-- Commit Summary --
* add g2.2xlarge EC2 instance size (JCLOUDS-364)
*
@@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ private TemplateBuilder newTemplateBuilder(SupplierSet?
extends Image images
SupplierSet? extends Hardware sizes = Suppliers.Set? extends
Hardware ofInstance(ImmutableSet
.Hardware of(t1_micro().build(), c1_medium().build(),
c1_xlarge().build(),
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-cli/136/
--
[...truncated 1271 lines...]
Uploading:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/jclouds/cli/jclouds-cli-assembly/1.8.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
Uploaded:
Finally I had time to finish the generic TOC.
Nice, thanks @nacx! One initial comment about the sample TOC: it's so long that
a reader now has to scroll down quite a way to see some content.
Is there some way we could make this expandable, with minimized being the
default? Either section by
@@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ private TemplateBuilder newTemplateBuilder(SupplierSet?
extends Image images
SupplierSet? extends Hardware sizes = Suppliers.Set? extends
Hardware ofInstance(ImmutableSet
.Hardware of(t1_micro().build(), c1_medium().build(),
c1_xlarge().build(),
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1094](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1094/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/305#issuecomment-36271343
I suspect that we have Checkstyle enabled but misconfigured for 1.5.x. I will
verify this PR locally then push to 1.5.x.
@chemikadze any reason you cannot move forward to 1.7.1?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ private TemplateBuilder newTemplateBuilder(SupplierSet?
extends Image images
SupplierSet? extends Hardware sizes = Suppliers.Set? extends
Hardware ofInstance(ImmutableSet
.Hardware of(t1_micro().build(), c1_medium().build(),
c1_xlarge().build(),
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13914823#comment-13914823
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-383:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13914825#comment-13914825
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-431:
-
Commit
Verified locally, pushed to 1.5.x. Note that we do not currently plan another
1.5 release.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/305#issuecomment-36272966
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13914822#comment-13914822
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-364:
-
Commit
Hello all,
When will the release of the 1.6.x version be made with this backport in it?
Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/263#issuecomment-36276046
@splittingfield can you move forward to the 1.7.1 release?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/263#issuecomment-36276255
Unfortunately, I do not think that we can yet, due to internal use of the async
code that was deprecated (assuming I understand the state of the world properly)
We use/contributed the AzureBlob work.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
To repro issue 342, the following steps were taken:
- Spawn 500 parallel / 2000 total putBlobs to cloudfiles-uk
- issue a SIGSTOP
- wait 60 seconds
- issue a SIGCONT
Without this patch, there are several hundred 408s.
With this patch, these are retried and complete successfully.
You can merge
:+1: tested commit locally.
@zack-shoylev could you take a look at this since it increases the failure
counter you added in 578a77d6313ce0945f8d29e82103e09787622c58?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36281263
@andrewgaul Does this also need to be adapted to the openstack-keystone
[RetryOnRenew](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/apis/openstack-keystone/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/keystone/v2_0/handlers/RetryOnRenew.java)
?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds
#872](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/872/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1095](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1095/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36285936
[jclouds-pull-requests
#625](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/625/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36286123
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-1.5.x-branch/253/changes
@jaggett Sorry I misunderstood, thought you were referring to the new labs
openstack-swift provider. I guess we could make similar changes to
openstack-keystone. Do any of the public providers use the newer Keystone
implementation?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
+import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * @author Jeremy Daggett
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class RegionToCDNEndpoint implements FunctionObject, URI {
+
+ private final SupplierMapString, SupplierURI endpointsSupplier;
+
+
+
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
+import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * @author Jeremy Daggett
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class RegionToCDNEndpoint implements FunctionObject, URI {
+
+ private final SupplierMapString, SupplierURI endpointsSupplier;
+
+
Yes. To the old site.
Ah, OK. Then we're all set!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/commit/887453cd8a677b3d8330c6d7287f9e92a82e71c8#commitcomment-5516708
+
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
+import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * @author Jeremy Daggett
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class RegionToCDNEndpoint implements FunctionObject, URI {
+
+ private final SupplierMapString, SupplierURI endpointsSupplier;
+
+
+
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
+import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * @author Jeremy Daggett
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class RegionToCDNEndpoint implements FunctionObject, URI {
+
+ private final SupplierMapString, SupplierURI endpointsSupplier;
+
+
Also, two commits form these PR are missed on `1.6.x` branch. C-picked them too
https://github.com/chemikadze/jclouds/tree/1.6.x-backports for convenience.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/305#issuecomment-36303004
Verified locally, pushed to 1.6.x. Note that we do no currently plan another
1.6 release.
@chemikadze any reason you cannot move forward to 1.7.1?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/305#issuecomment-36304982
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13915197#comment-13915197
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-431:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13915196#comment-13915196
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-412:
-
Commit
+
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
+import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * @author Jeremy Daggett
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class RegionToCDNEndpoint implements FunctionObject, URI {
+
+ private final SupplierMapString, SupplierURI endpointsSupplier;
+
+
What else needs to be reviewed here in order to get this PR in? I have several
others that depend on this PR being merged first, so please let me know asap.
Thanks. :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-chef-1.6.x-branch/70/
--
[...truncated 2420 lines...]
---
T E S T S
---
Results :
Tests run: 0,
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-1.6.x-branch/59/
--
[...truncated 18706 lines...]
[Unloading class GregorSamsa]
[Unloading class GregorSamsa]
[Unloading class GregorSamsa]
[Unloading class
47 matches
Mail list logo
