Ignasi Barrera created JCLOUDS-483:
--
Summary: Create a proper LoadBalancer abstraction
Key: JCLOUDS-483
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-483
Project: jclouds
Issue Type:
@@ -297,6 +305,14 @@ public CreateServerOptions userData(byte[] userData) {
}
/**
+* This needs to be set to true when trying to use user data for
cloud-init.
Good point, I will have to look into that. Not completely sure how user-data is
used by itself.
---
Reply to this
@@ -541,5 +561,18 @@ public NovaTemplateOptions userData(byte[] userData) {
public NovaTemplateOptions diskConfig(String diskConfig) {
this.diskConfig = diskConfig;
return this;
- }
+ }
+
+ /**
+* OpenStack can be configured to write metadata to a special
@@ -290,6 +297,7 @@ public CreateServerOptions metadata(MapString, String
metadata) {
* Custom user-data can be also be supplied at launch time.
* It is retrievable by the instance and is often used for launch-time
configuration
* by instance scripts.
+* This parameter
@@ -541,5 +561,18 @@ public NovaTemplateOptions userData(byte[] userData) {
public NovaTemplateOptions diskConfig(String diskConfig) {
this.diskConfig = diskConfig;
return this;
- }
+ }
+
+ /**
+* OpenStack can be configured to write metadata to a special
[jclouds » jclouds
#877](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/877/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/877/changes
jclouds » jclouds #877 UNSTABLE
Unrelated [test
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1099](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1099/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/307#issuecomment-36552436
About to merge
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/79#issuecomment-36559988
@zack-shoylev If I understand you correctly, you're saying we should remove
line 72, right?
@demobox I'll make that expect more specific.
@andrewgaul I'll add some more tests.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36561072
I'll make that expect more specific.
Thanks, @tdmanv!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36561864
Go ahead!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/79#issuecomment-36562105
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack
#883](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/883/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests
#171](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/171/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/79#issuecomment-36562607
merged - should be good to close
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/79#issuecomment-36563186
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13918607#comment-13918607
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-423:
-
Commit
@nacx Thought of one more. It would be nice to have if we could have the actual
blog posts under jclouds.apache.org/blog//MM/DD instead of how they current
are under jclouds.apache.org//MM/DD.
I'm in the middle of a 12 hour meeting right now so I really don't have a
chance to dig into
@everett-toews I tried that but that broke all other links in the site, and
couldn't find a way to do that... :(
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36566809
Is this my browser/window size, or intentional?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36567304
@demobox It's not intentional, and it should be great to have it fixed before
merging. The logo issue was mentioned [here in the old pull
request](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/51#issuecomment-31812479),
and I couldn't make it be properly aligned. Any help on this is highly
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1100](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1100/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36572064
Getting ready to merge, then work on backport.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/307#issuecomment-36572915
Closed #79.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/79
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#198](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/198/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36573582
Go to
http://6c51efcb70dd975b240c-f3a3f42054c8a2f614324a87c08e9be8.r64.cf1.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36573801
I've just added a blog post about the move to the ASF, the new site and the
1.7.0 and 1.7.1 release. It's been a while since the last post, and we should
properly announce the new site and the new releases.
I'm not the best one at writing, so feel free to comment or directly edit the
post!
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#199](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/199/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36575137
Go to
http://5f5c76d0ae31c29657f3-ce10666acc207bc2a2c4d10e66026eca.r10.cf1.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36575235
Closed #307.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/307
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/rackspace/jclouds backport-nova-userdata
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/308
-- Commit Summary --
* Better documentation and a bugfix for cloud-init
[jclouds » jclouds
#878](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/878/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Go to
http://1b8a48b71b14668ec88e-8f018a5e0a20b39abc763cc7fc4f2ba7.r87.cf1.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36576456
[jclouds-pull-requests
#630](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/630/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36576758
[jclouds-pull-requests
#631](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/631/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/307#issuecomment-36577622
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1101](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1101/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/307#issuecomment-36578148
[jclouds-pull-requests
#633](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/633/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36578840
[jclouds » jclouds
#879](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/879/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/879/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13918839#comment-13918839
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-342:
-
Commit
I ran the Swift unit tests and cloudfiles-us live tests locally, squashed
commit, and pushed to master and 1.7.x. Thank you for your contribution
@tdmanv!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36580061
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13918840#comment-13918840
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-342:
-
Commit
Closed #306.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306
[jclouds-pull-requests
#632](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/632/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/308#issuecomment-36580208
[jclouds » jclouds
#880](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/880/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1103](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1103/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/306#issuecomment-36582153
Andrew Gaul created JCLOUDS-484:
---
Summary: Add compatibility matrix for providers
Key: JCLOUDS-484
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-484
Project: jclouds
Issue Type:
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-1.7.x-branch/72/
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/308#issuecomment-36590451
Closed #308.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/308
Rebased, ready to merge.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/32#issuecomment-36590555
Closed #32.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/32
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/32#issuecomment-36590624
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-1.7.x-branch/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/51/
I tried varying the number of threads from 10 to 50 and deleting a container
with at least 5K blobs. Things worked fine. I'll rebase this patch on top of
the current ToT and send out.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13919056#comment-13919056
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-460:
-
Commit
Let's go with the existing simpler delay for now. One we have more experience
with timeouts we can increase them or the jitter as appropriate. Pushed to
master and 1.7.x.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/286#issuecomment-36595957
Closed #286.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/286
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-460.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.7.2
1.8.0
Add random delay to
Wait. Why did this get merged?
The dependent code NovaTemplateOptions.configDrive() hasn't been released yet.
Unless I'm missing something, this needs to be reverted ASAP.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Please go through the imports. I count 5 that are unnecessary.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/32#issuecomment-36598318
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/883/changes
62 matches
Mail list logo
