I'd like it in 1.7.x. This issue affects also the Jenkins plugin and
backporting will help implementing the changes on the Jenkins side.
Thanks for your work here @cdancy!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/425#issuecomment-48276983
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/andreaturli/jclouds-site feature/docker
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/110
-- Commit Summary --
* add docker guide
-- File Changes --
M
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#351](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/351/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/110#issuecomment-48280249
Go to
http://5350652a3b3a0f832b33-2bb942a57461dcb381b0c2aeb0a12b23.r79.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/110#issuecomment-48280414
+permalink: /guides/docker/
+---
+
+jclouds-docker is a local cloud provider modelled on
[docker](http://www.docker.io). Similar to other jclouds supported
+providers, it supports the same portable abstractions offered by jclouds.
+
+
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+---
+layout: page
+title: Docker: Getting Started Guide
+permalink: /guides/docker/
+---
+
+jclouds-docker is a local cloud provider modelled on
[docker](http://www.docker.io). Similar to other jclouds supported
+providers, it supports the same portable abstractions
+* Ensure you are using a recent JDK 6
+* Setup your project to include `docker`
+ * Get the dependency `org.jclouds.labs/docker` using jclouds
[Installation](/start/install).
+* Start coding
+
+{% highlight java %}
+// get a context with docker that offers the portable ComputeService
+ .modules(ImmutableSet.Module of(new
Log4JLoggingModule(),
+new
SshjSshClientModule()))
+ .buildView(ComputeServiceContext.class);
+ComputeService client = context.getComputeService();
+
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds.provider$cloudservers-uk/2670/
--
[INFO]
[INFO]
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1107](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1107/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#92](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/92/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/33#issuecomment-48292319
+ BucketTemplateInternal template = new BucketTemplateInternal(src);
+ JsonObject bucketTemplate = (JsonObject)
context.serialize(template, BucketTemplateInternal.class);
+
+ // deal with bucketAccessControls
+ if (!(src.getAcl() == null)
+bucketTemplate.add(acl, null);
+ }
+ // deal with DefaultObjectAccessControls
+ if (!(src.getDefaultObjectAccessControls() == null)
(src.getDefaultObjectAccessControls().isEmpty())) {
+bucketTemplate.add(defaultObjectAccessControls, null);
Did this PR get merged? I ask only because the last github message here is
noting there are unmerged commits.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/419#issuecomment-48326473
Yes it is. You'll find it if you look at the history.
When you rebase to the latest master, the commit hash changes, and that's why
GitHub does not detect the PR as merged. Usually we ask contributors to rebase
the branch before merging, but sometimes is just more agile to rebase to the
latest
It does and thank you ;)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/419#issuecomment-48329444
@@ -32,31 +30,30 @@
* @see a href= https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/cross-origin; /
*/
-public final class BucketCors {
- private final SetString origins;
- private final SetString methods;
- private final SetString responseHeaders;
+public class BucketCors {
+
I'd like it in 1.7.x.
@nacx I tried to apply [the
patch](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12654411/JCLOUDS-607.patch)
but it doesn't work on master. Could you submit a PR for 1.7.x..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
NP! I'll do later today.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/425#issuecomment-48363551
NP! I'll do later today.
Thanks! ;-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/425#issuecomment-48367854
@nacx Can you give this another look? Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/111#issuecomment-48395860
+
+import com.google.common.base.Objects;
+
+/**
+ * A Neutron Subnet Allocation Pool
+ *
+ * @see a
+ *
href=http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/Subnets.html;api
+ * doc/a
+ */
+public class AllocationPool {
+
+ protected final String start;
+
+ @SerializedName(n1kv:segment_add)
+ protected final String segmentAdd;
+ @SerializedName(n1kv:segment_del)
+ protected final String segmentDel;
+ @SerializedName(n1kv:member_segments)
+ protected final String memberSegments;
+
+ // multiprovidernet.py: Multiprovider net
+ @GET
+ @Path(/{id})
+ @ResponseParser(ParseRouters.class)
+ @Fallback(EmptyRoutersFallback.class)
+ Routers get(@PathParam(id) String id);
+
+ /**
+* Create a new router
+*
+* @param router Options for creating a router
+* @return the newly created router
I had this PR in the bottom of the TODO list, sorry for my late reply!
I like the new pattern you propose. The model and the APIs look cleaner. The
code look good to me, just a couple comments:
* There are several POST requests that have the ReturnNullOn404 fallback.
Does the service really
Thanks so much for having a look!
ReturnNullOn404 - this needs to be fixed (I am pretty sure service does not
return it, but still double checking some sources)
@ConstructorProperties - based on previous discussions, I will add it back to
domain classes. The plan is to rework those to follow
+
+import com.google.common.base.Objects;
+
+/**
+ * A Neutron Subnet Allocation Pool
+ *
+ * @see a
+ *
href=http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/Subnets.html;api
+ * doc/a
+ */
+public class AllocationPool {
+
+ protected final String start;
+
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/andrewgaul/jclouds consume-on-close
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/435
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-417: Remove ConsumeOnCloseInputStream
*
Closed #243.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/243#event-139482818
@tdmanv Another user asked about cancellation on the jclouds user list and I
revived your commit and added at test at #435.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/243#issuecomment-48410699
@tdmanv Please review. `git log` shows the correct attribution; unsure why
GitHub shows @jenkins-maginatics.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/435#issuecomment-48410781
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-417:
Assignee: Thomas Manville
Payload.getInput.close reads all bytes from its InputStream
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-417:
Summary: Payload.getInput.close reads all bytes from its InputStream (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-417:
Description:
Users do not expect this behavior when aborting getBlob operations. Further,
by
34 matches
Mail list logo
