You can have a look at the
[TenantAdminApiMockTest](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/apis/openstack-keystone/src/test/java/org/jclouds/openstack/keystone/v2_0/extensions/TenantAdminApiMockTest.java)
for an example.
That test uses the OS-KSADM extension and you'll see the
What you think about merge it now?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-52895617
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14105279#comment-14105279
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-681:
Could this be the same issue than
@ccustine: Quick ping to see if someone else can take a quick look..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/53#issuecomment-52925276
* @return The {@link Account} object.
*/
@Named(account:get)
@HEAD
@ResponseParser(ParseAccountFromHeaders.class)
- @Path(/)
@zack-shoylev That is my understanding as well. According to the docs:
A @Path value isn’t required to have leading or trailing slashes (/).
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/433/changes
Changes:
[Jeremy Daggett] JCLOUDS-630: Map Payload ContentMetadata expires to Swift
X-Delete-At header for object expiration.
--
[...truncated 3967 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude:
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/org.apache.jclouds.labs$openstack-swift/433/
--
[...truncated 394 lines...]
[pool-7-thread-5] Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14105568#comment-14105568
]
Irina Mok commented on JCLOUDS-681:
---
Confirmed. The issue exists in 1.8.0. Also checked
Closed #133.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/133#event-155688037
jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #365 FAILURE
Shows some new [Checkstyle
violations](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/365/),
but I'm not sure whether they're real because the build barfed. Let's try
again...
---
Reply to this email directly or
Reopened #133.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/133#event-155688048
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
groupIdorg.apache.jclouds/groupId
artifactIdjclouds-project/artifactId
version2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/version
+relativePath /
@demobox Yeah, you have the gist of it now. There is a long running debate
about this but I doubt it will ever be resolved:
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ limitations under the License.
joda.version2.1/joda.version
jsch.bundle.version0.1.44_2/jsch.bundle.version
jsch.agentproxy.version0.0.7/jsch.agentproxy.version
+
jsch.agentproxy.bundle.version${jsch.agentproxy.version}_2/jsch.agentproxy.bundle.version
:+1: and I'll repeat that if any servicemix bundle stuff comes up again let me
know and I can get it in quickly.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/53#issuecomment-52969565
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
private BindToJsonPayload jsonBinder;
@Override
- public R extends HttpRequest R bindToRequest(R request, MapString,
Object postParams) {
+ public R extends HttpRequest R bindToRequest(R request, MapString,
Object postParams) throws
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@
* The entity holding the permission. Can be user-userId,
user-emailAddress, group-groupId,
* group-emailAddress, allUsers, or allAuthenticatedUsers.
*
-* @return a BucketAccessControls resource
+* @return a {@link
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@
* The entity holding the permission. Can be user-userId,
user-emailAddress, group-groupId,
* group-emailAddress, allUsers, or allAuthenticatedUsers.
*
-* @return a BucketAccessControls resource
+* @return a {@link
Please address the minor nits, mostly Javadoc-related. This commit has a few
unrelated changes: using UUID, Javadoc changes, and the actual new tests.
Please break changes into component parts in future pull requests.
@mattstep This pull request has been open for almost a month! Do you plan
+ public String getEntityId() {
+ return entityId;
+ }
+
+ public ProjectTeam getProjectTeam() {
+ return projectTeam;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public boolean equals(Object obj) {
+ if (this == obj)
+ return true;
+ if (obj == null || getClass() !=
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version
+
+ // Test updateObjectAccessControls
+ public void testPatchObjectaclWithNoOptionsResponseIs2xx() throws
Exception {
+ HttpRequest patchRequest = HttpRequest
+ .builder()
+ .method(PATCH)
+
+
+public class ObjectaclGetTest extends
BaseGoogleCloudStorageParseTestObjectAccessControls {
+
+ @Override
+ public String resource() {
+ return /objectacl_get.json;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+ public ObjectAccessControls expected() {
+
+ public static Builder builder() {
+ return new Builder();
+ }
+
+ public Builder toBuilder() {
+ return new Builder().fromListObjectAccessControls(this);
+ }
+
+ public static final class Builder {
+
+ private Kind kind;
+ private
+public class BucketAccessControlsApiLiveTest extends
BaseGoogleCloudStorageApiLiveTest {
+
+ protected static final String BUCKET_NAME = jcloudstestbucketacl +
UUID.randomUUID();
+
+ private BucketAccessControlsApi api() {
+ return api.getBucketAccessControlsApi();
+ }
+
+
I encountered some compilation errors related to Guava 18:
```
[ERROR]
/home/gaul/work/jclouds-labs-google/google-cloud-storage/src/main/java/org/jclouds/googlecloudstorage/domain/ObjectAccessControls.java:[110,37]
string() in org.jclouds.googlecloudstorage.domain.ObjectAccessControls cannot
Can't see any relativePath warnings [in the
log](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/366/consoleFull).
Funnily enough, I can't find any in [older
builds](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/360/consoleFull)
either...am
comes up again let me know and I can get it in quickly.
Thanks, @ccustine! Freeman was pretty quick to jump on
[SMX4-1749](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1749), which was helpful.
I'm not wild on the versioning, but I gather that's the way ServiceMix does
things. And, as far as I
@demobox That is really strange because these warnings have been ongoing for as
long as I can remember! I always assumed it was because of the split repos.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/133#issuecomment-52979971
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1262/
--
GitHub pull request #35 to jclouds/jclouds-labs-google
Building remotely on s-5cd33e3c in workspace
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/ws/
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1262](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1262/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#116](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/116/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+ @ConstructorProperties({id, tenant_id, name, description,
security_group_rules})
+ protected SecurityGroup(String id, String tenantId, String name, String
description,
+ ImmutableListSecurityGroupRule securityGroupRules) {
+ this.id = id;
+ this.tenantId =
+
+ return Objects.equal(this.id, that.id)
+Objects.equal(this.tenantId, that.tenantId)
+Objects.equal(this.name, that.name)
+Objects.equal(this.description, that.description)
+Objects.equal(this.securityGroupRules,
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/666/changes
Changes:
[Andrew Phillips] Using ServiceMix bundle for jsch-agentproxy-sshj
--
Started by an SCM change
Building remotely on 7a610052 (lxc-fedora17 m1.small small) in workspace
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#117](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/117/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+*/
+ @Nullable
+ public String getName() {
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ /**
+* @return The description of the security group.
+*/
+ @Nullable
+ public String getDescription() {
+ return description;
+ }
+
+ /**
+* @return The identifier of the
+*/
+ @Nullable
+ public String getName() {
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ /**
+* @return The description of the security group.
+*/
+ @Nullable
+ public String getDescription() {
+ return description;
+ }
+
+ /**
+* @return The identifier of the
+
+ return Objects.equal(this.id, that.id)
+Objects.equal(this.tenantId, that.tenantId)
+Objects.equal(this.name, that.name)
+Objects.equal(this.description, that.description)
+Objects.equal(this.securityGroupRules,
+ @ConstructorProperties({id, tenant_id, name, description,
security_group_rules})
+ protected SecurityGroup(String id, String tenantId, String name, String
description,
+ ImmutableListSecurityGroupRule securityGroupRules) {
+ this.id = id;
+ this.tenantId =
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1263/changes
Changes:
[Bhathiya] JCLOUDS-458: Live tests for BucketAccessControls and
DefaultObjectAccess Controls
--
[...truncated 201 lines...]
[pool-1-thread-4] Test
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1263](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1263/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+ return self();
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * The name for this rule.
+ *
+ * @return the Builder.
+ * @see SecurityGroup#getName()
+ */
+ public ParameterizedBuilderType name(String name) {
+ securityGroup.name = name;
+ return
+
+ protected abstract ParameterizedBuilderType self();
+
+ /**
+ * The tenant id for this rule. Usually can only be specified by
administrators.
+ *
+ * @return the Builder.
+ * @see SecurityGroup#getTenantId()
+ */
+ public
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#118](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/118/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+
+ private abstract static class BuilderParameterizedBuilderType {
+ // Keep track of the builder's state.
+ protected SecurityGroup securityGroup;
+
+ /**
+ * No-parameters constructor.
+ * */
+ private Builder() {
+ securityGroup = new
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1204/changes
Changes:
[Andrew Phillips] Using ServiceMix bundle for jsch-agentproxy-sshj
--
[...truncated 411 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/.project
[INFO] Exclude: **/.classpath
[INFO]
+ @Nullable
+ public Integer getPortRangeMin() {
+ return portRangeMin;
+ }
+
+ /**
+* @return The maximum port number in the range that is matched by the
security group rule. The port_range_min
+* attribute constrains the port_range_max attribute. If the protocol is
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1264](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1264/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1264/changes
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;a=commit;h=d5976d69b9719b6a1c1b96e267c10cb237c4080b)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/53#issuecomment-52987762
Closed #53.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/53#event-155804364
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1265](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1265/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#119](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/119/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/35#issuecomment-52989034
@hsbhathiya Can you rebase this commit? I see errors of the form:
```
[ERROR] /home/gaul/work/jclouds-labs-google/google-cloud-storage/src/main/java/o
rg/jclouds/googlecloudstorage/config/OAuthModuleWithoutTypeAdapters.java:[19,35]
cannot find symbol
symbol: class CredentialType
location:
@@ -133,7 +126,7 @@ HttpResponse
deleteDefaultObjectAccessControls(@PathParam(bucket) String bucke
* @param generation
* If present, selects a specific revision of this object
*
-* @return ListObjectAccessControls resource
+* @return (@link
+ DefaultObjectAccessControls defaultObjectacl =
DefaultObjectAccessControls.builder().bucket(BUCKET_NAME)
+ .entity(allUsers).role(ObjectRole.READER).build();
+ DefaultObjectAccessControls response =
api().patchDefaultObjectAccessControls(BUCKET_NAME, allUsers,
+
+public class DefaultObjectAccessControlsApiLiveTest extends
BaseGoogleCloudStorageApiLiveTest {
+
+ protected static final String BUCKET_NAME = jcloudtestbucketdefaultoacl
+ UUID.randomUUID();
+
+ private DefaultObjectAccessControlsApi api() {
+ return
Closed #133.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/133#event-155832927
I already pushed this to master a bit ago
Fine with me! I don't think this can hurt... ;-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/133#issuecomment-52994940
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
groupIdorg.apache.jclouds/groupId
artifactIdjclouds-project/artifactId
version2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/version
+relativePath /
+1 - makes sense to me. Thanks for the link!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Shri Javadekar created JCLOUDS-684:
--
Summary: Add option to delete containers without deleting objects
inside it
Key: JCLOUDS-684
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-684
Project:
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds.api$swift/2728/
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/435/
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/org.apache.jclouds.labs$openstack-marconi/435/
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1205/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14106416#comment-14106416
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-684:
-
[~shrinand]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14106423#comment-14106423
]
Andrew Gaul edited comment on JCLOUDS-685 at 8/22/14 3:54 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14106423#comment-14106423
]
Andrew Gaul edited comment on JCLOUDS-685 at 8/22/14 3:54 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul reassigned JCLOUDS-685:
---
Assignee: Shri Javadekar
This API sounds good; can you implement a fallback in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-684.
-
Resolution: Not a Problem
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
Add option to delete
70 matches
Mail list logo
