Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf » jclouds :: Karaf :: Integration Tests #1904

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf #1904

See

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1160) Consider gson 2.7 upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15447979#comment-15447979 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1160: -- Commit

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf #1903

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf » jclouds :: Karaf :: Integration Tests #1903

See

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds-karaf » jclouds :: Karaf :: Integration Tests #1902

See

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1160: Upgrade to Gson 2.7 (#1000)

> gson does not have any runtime dependencies: Thanks for confirming, Andrew G! -- You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1000#issuecomment-243320246

[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-1160) Consider gson 2.7 upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-1160. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Andrew Gaul Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > Consider gson

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1160) Consider gson 2.7 upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15447817#comment-15447817 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1160: -- Commit

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1160: Upgrade to Gson 2.7 (#1000)

gson does not have any runtime dependencies: ``` [INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:tree (default-cli) @ gson --- [INFO] com.google.code.gson:gson:jar:2.7.1-SNAPSHOT [INFO] \- junit:junit:jar:4.12:test [INFO]\- org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:jar:1.3:test ``` -- You are receiving this

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

> If we want to have any automatic cleanup, we need to make sure to put this in > ourselves Yes, sure - sorry if that wasn't clear. I was thinking mainly of the site snapshots, which I thought is all that account was being used for. If there was also test output in there we'd obviously need to

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

@demobox If we want to have any automatic cleanup, we need to make sure to put this in ourselves. I know some of the old jclouds tests didn't do a very good job cleaning up after themselves, especially in case of failures. It's a lot better now, but there might still be some leakage. -- You

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1160: Upgrade to Gson 2.7 (#1000)

> I'd say this is good to merge Good enough for me - +1 from me too. Thanks for the additional details, Ignasi! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1161) Signed PUT requests using signature v4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shri Javadekar updated JCLOUDS-1161: Description: JIRA issues JCLOUDS-766 and JCLOUDS-1090 mention that signed put requests

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

> It was erased because it went significantly over the credit provided; working > on getting a new one now. @zack-shoylev: Thanks for the update! Can we put in place some kind of regular purging? We really shouldn't need to store anything in there that's more than a month old, or so - and even

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

> @@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ If you do not have a *pom.xml* file, you can copy and > paste the one below. If yo > > ### Using the daily builds > > + > +Warning! These are snapshot builds; untested builds > provided for your convenience. They have not been tested, and are not > official releases of

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ > data-toggle="dropdown">About Apache > > http://www.apache.org;>The Apache > Software Foundation > + href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/;>License Link to

[jclouds/jclouds] Promoted Docker (#1002)

**DO NOT MERGE** This PR promotes Docker from the jclouds-labs repo keeping the commit history. See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/How+to+Promote+a+Provider This is only opened to validate the build and to see how it looks like, but should not be merged yet. You can

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1160) Consider gson 2.7 upgrade

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15447219#comment-15447219 ] Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1160: --- > It also includes an improvement to the @SerializedName

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

It was erased because it went significantly over the credit provided; working on getting a new one now. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/185#issuecomment-243270452

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

@zack-shoylev Any updates on the testing account? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/185#issuecomment-243269124

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

to review your changes. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/185#issuecomment-243267786

[jclouds/jclouds-site] Snapshot warning (#185)

Added reference to the GSoC post in the landing page, and warnings to the snapshot downloads according to the ASF policy for distribution of unreleased material. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/185 -- Commit Summary

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Typo: removing "or" from last message. (#1001)

Thanks @nelsonjr! Pushed to master as [15ea6929](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/15ea6929). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Typo: removing "or" from last message. (#1001)

Closed #1001. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1001#event-771293686

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1160: Upgrade to Gson 2.7 (#1000)

I don't think so. AFAIK we don't have dependencies that rely on gson apart form jclouds-core. I'd say the change is safe. All mock and expect tests passing give us a lot of confidence. There are several providers (such as Chef) that use complex adapters and all tests are still passing. There

[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-1158) DockerComputeServiceAdapter.getImage(String) doesn't work correctly for Docker on RHEL Atomic host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1158. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 >

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Pb compute api (#292)

> should i be following this apply those changes ? Yes. I just added a comment before having read this one :) I've tried to summarise the intent of the important bits in that commit, but feel free to ask for help/clarification, etc! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Pb compute api (#292)

> +if (image != null) { > +logger.trace(">> found image [%s].", image.properties().name()); > +return image; > +} > +// try search snapshots > +logger.trace("<< not found from images. searching for snapshot with > id=%s", id); > +

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1158 fix Docker find image Predicate (#314)

Thanks @kwart, you rock! :) Merged to master as [44946467]( http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/44946467). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1158 fix Docker find image Predicate (#314)

Closed #314. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/314#event-771256770

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Docker live test fix - SshToCustomPortLiveTest (#313)

Closed #313. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/313#event-771255874

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Docker live test fix - SshToCustomPortLiveTest (#313)

Thanks for the quick fixes! Pushed to master as [66c7617d](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/66c7617d). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1158) DockerComputeServiceAdapter.getImage(String) doesn't work correctly for Docker on RHEL Atomic host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15446992#comment-15446992 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1158: -- Commit

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1154 oneandone-publicip-api (#310)

And also rebase to the latest master when you do that, so I can merge it :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/310#issuecomment-243248548

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1154 oneandone-publicip-api (#310)

Thanks @alibazlamit! Just one last thing remaining: the pom.xml file seems to be changed just for formatting; I've not identified any real change in the content. Can you remove it from the pull request? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1158 fix Docker find image Predicate (#314)

I've changed the logic, so it uses regular expression now. Optional prefix and suffix were moved into constants. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Pb compute api (#292)

@nacx should i be following [this ](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/7202e0557f620c272feaca3e9a49b6e45a77a791) apply those changes ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1161) Signed PUT requests using signature v4

Shri Javadekar created JCLOUDS-1161: --- Summary: Signed PUT requests using signature v4 Key: JCLOUDS-1161 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1161 Project: jclouds Issue Type:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Pb compute api (#292)

> +if (image != null) { > +logger.trace(">> found image [%s].", image.properties().name()); > +return image; > +} > +// try search snapshots > +logger.trace("<< not found from images. searching for snapshot with > id=%s", id); > +

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1154 oneandone-publicip-api (#310)

@nacx please review -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/310#issuecomment-243157556

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1154 oneandone-publicip-api (#310)

rebuild please -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/310#issuecomment-243154514

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1154 oneandone-publicip-api (#310)

@alibazlamit pushed 1 commit. 10f8b9b removed dev code -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/310/files/2d13c8a2f8ea726218115e8c4fb63f26ecc4ae7f..10f8b9b8b4abafe5190b0778ca6288a9f4a1d9bf

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1154 oneandone-publicip-api (#310)

@alibazlamit pushed 2 commits. 650ad0d Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs into oneandone-publicip-api 2d13c8a Updated minor changes -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: