Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
merged -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010#issuecomment-247129173
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
Closed #1010. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010#event-789701771
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
andrewgaul approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010#pullrequestreview-29746
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1166) Remove uses of the 'com.google.gson.internal' package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15491100#comment-15491100
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1166:
-
[~andrewp] what do you think about the custom bundle approach?
> Remove uses of the 'com.google.gson.internal' package
> -
>
> Key: JCLOUDS-1166
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1166
> Project: jclouds
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jclouds-chef, jclouds-core
>Affects Versions: 1.9.2
>Reporter: Ignasi Barrera
> Labels: gson
>
> Starting from Gson 2.6, the {{com.google.gson.internal}} packages are no
> longer exported in the OSGi bundles. This makes it impossible to use jclouds
> in an OSGi environment if upgrading to such versions of Gson.
> There is no change to add the exports back for that package (see [this
> discussion|https://github.com/google/gson/pull/916]), so we should stop using
> those classes.
> See also: http://markmail.org/message/olgebygfgdy3hwtm
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1005) Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15491045#comment-15491045 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1005: -- Commit 5e01c0733b9e5cb2937a46fbfd7fae257bec2687 in jclouds-cli's branch refs/heads/master from [~gaul] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-cli.git;h=5e01c07 ] JCLOUDS-1005: Add Backblaze B2 > Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1005 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: jclouds-blobstore >Affects Versions: 1.9.1 >Reporter: Andrew Gaul >Assignee: Andrew Gaul > Labels: b2 > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > Backblaze announced B2 which has its own object storage API: > https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1132) Amazon AWS - Create Volume - query params reported as unrecognized
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15490994#comment-15490994 ] Tusa Mihail Cristian commented on JCLOUDS-1132: --- Hi Felix, You can check out the Cloud Slang open-source project on GitHub. In https://github.com/CloudSlang/cs-actions/tree/master/cs-jclouds/src/main/java/io/cloudslang/content/jclouds/actions you can find actions that can be (re)used. Basically they made HTTP calls using Query API pattern against Amazon without using any third-party library. So, check it out if you have time... maybe you can find there something useful. Note that right now is a mix (J-Clouds and Query API) but soon will be only Query API. Mihai Tusa > Amazon AWS - Create Volume - query params reported as unrecognized > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1132 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 1.9.0, 1.9.2 > Environment: Amazon AWS EC2 management console >Reporter: Tusa Mihail Cristian > > Let say that I want to create a Volume that is encrypted. So, I set the > encrypted on "true"... in request query params apear "=true". In > this case the error that I got is: > UnknownParameterThe parameter > Encrypted is not > recognizedc874434a-b00e-425d-baf4-18087441603a > > instead it should be: "=1" as it is shown in Amazon docs: > http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/API_CreateVolume.html > in Example/Sample request. The problems are also related with Volume Type. If > not specified than creates a standard volume but if anything specified (any > of valid Values: standard | io1 | gp2 | sc1 | st1 ) the same error with > unrecognized param is received. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-1172: Use an OSGi-compliant way of loading JSR 223 script engines (#79)
Yay! Thanks @demobox! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/79#issuecomment-247085174
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
>I will try to do a separate PR for it (out of scope for this one). Great :) Thanks! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010#issuecomment-247084474
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
@nacx 1176: I will try to do a separate PR for it (out of scope for this one). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010#issuecomment-247083691
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-1172: Use an OSGi-compliant way of loading JSR 223 script engines (#79)
Merged to master: df7d4de -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/79#issuecomment-247083256
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-1172: Use an OSGi-compliant way of loading JSR 223 script engines (#79)
Closed #79. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/79#event-789475508
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] fix azure-arm features live tests (#317)
Can you share the live test output after this change? The base compute service has some issues regarding access to the VM. I will be able to allocate some time to look at it next week, so I wouldn't worry about those. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/317#issuecomment-247082829
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] fix azure-arm features live tests (#317)
Build failed due to checkstyle errors: https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/1447/org.apache.jclouds.labs$azurecompute-arm/violations/ -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/317#issuecomment-247082444
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
Does this also fix JCLOUDS-1176? (Just asking to understand the scope of this PR :)) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010#issuecomment-247080469
[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1172) Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-1172: - Attachment: JCLOUDS-1172.patch > Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-karaf >Affects Versions: 1.9.2 >Reporter: Ignasi Barrera >Assignee: Andrew Phillips > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: JCLOUDS-1172.patch > > > When using the interactive shell, the script engines that are used to render > the values of the columns are not loaded, resulting in blank output lines > when running commands. > This affects only the interactive shell. > See this discussion for more details: > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/77#issuecomment-244901813 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-1172) Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Phillips resolved JCLOUDS-1172. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-karaf >Affects Versions: 1.9.2 >Reporter: Ignasi Barrera >Assignee: Andrew Phillips > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: JCLOUDS-1172.patch > > > When using the interactive shell, the script engines that are used to render > the values of the columns are not loaded, resulting in blank output lines > when running commands. > This affects only the interactive shell. > See this discussion for more details: > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/77#issuecomment-244901813 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1172) Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15490907#comment-15490907 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1172: -- Commit df7d4de364e7ccf4288c50ff44616e0cd691a4ae in jclouds-karaf's branch refs/heads/master from [~demobox] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;h=df7d4de ] JCLOUDS-1172: Use an OSGi-compliant way of loading JSR 223 script engines > Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-karaf >Affects Versions: 1.9.2 >Reporter: Ignasi Barrera >Assignee: Andrew Phillips > > When using the interactive shell, the script engines that are used to render > the values of the columns are not loaded, resulting in blank output lines > when running commands. > This affects only the interactive shell. > See this discussion for more details: > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/77#issuecomment-244901813 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Added motivation for the bundles module (#80)
Merged to master: 522e245. Thanks, Ignasi! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/80#issuecomment-247077152
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Added motivation for the bundles module (#80)
Closed #80. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/80#event-789447874
[jira] [Assigned] (JCLOUDS-1172) Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Phillips reassigned JCLOUDS-1172: Assignee: Andrew Phillips (was: Ignasi Barrera) > Script engines are not loaded in the interactive shell > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1172 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-karaf >Affects Versions: 1.9.2 >Reporter: Ignasi Barrera >Assignee: Andrew Phillips > > When using the interactive shell, the script engines that are used to render > the values of the columns are not loaded, resulting in blank output lines > when running commands. > This affects only the interactive shell. > See this discussion for more details: > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/77#issuecomment-244901813 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1005) Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15490847#comment-15490847 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1005: -- Commit ccb5627659bb5895ef49b78db5052d2ff768069d in jclouds-karaf's branch refs/heads/fix-script-engine from [~gaul] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;h=ccb5627 ] JCLOUDS-1005: Add Backblaze B2 > Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1005 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: jclouds-blobstore >Affects Versions: 1.9.1 >Reporter: Andrew Gaul >Assignee: Andrew Gaul > Labels: b2 > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > Backblaze announced B2 which has its own object storage API: > https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
@zack-shoylev pushed 1 commit. c18747d review fixes -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010/files/304c72c3e24e376cebbb98bd3b8f8ad6ecd72dac..c18747de0aeb80b3a6ab9eae5c6ceddf6c8e3a1a
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] More fixes to parallel download resource cleanup (#1010)
> @@ -753,8 +770,24 @@ public Void call() {
> return null;
> }
> throw new RuntimeException("After " + retryCountLimit + " retries:
> " + lastException);
> + }
> +
> + // JDK-4715154
> + private void closeDirectBuffer(MappedByteBuffer mbb) {
logger is not static
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1010/files/304c72c3e24e376cebbb98bd3b8f8ad6ecd72dac#r78770058
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1005) Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15490659#comment-15490659 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1005: -- Commit ccb5627659bb5895ef49b78db5052d2ff768069d in jclouds-karaf's branch refs/heads/master from [~gaul] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;h=ccb5627 ] JCLOUDS-1005: Add Backblaze B2 > Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage > -- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1005 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: jclouds-blobstore >Affects Versions: 1.9.1 >Reporter: Andrew Gaul >Assignee: Andrew Gaul > Labels: b2 > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > Backblaze announced B2 which has its own object storage API: > https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] add support for whitelisting locations (#308)
> @@ -46,9 +44,9 @@ protected void bindErrorHandlers() {
> @Override
> protected void installLocations() {
>super.installLocations();
> - bind(ImplicitLocationSupplier.class).
> - to(OnlyLocationOrFirstRegionOptionallyMatchingRegionId.class).
I think `FirstRegion` as `ImplicitLocationSupplier` is a better choice here
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308/files/961db5c145342971726063e25776e0011ab8ed36#r78753512
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] add support for whitelisting locations (#308)
@andreaturli pushed 1 commit. aaae684 revert ZONES to REGIONS -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308/files/961db5c145342971726063e25776e0011ab8ed36..aaae68457526b198a2b30d7f648b4ef0b46ec359
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] add support for whitelisting locations (#308)
> @@ -46,9 +44,9 @@ protected void bindErrorHandlers() {
> @Override
> protected void installLocations() {
>super.installLocations();
> - bind(ImplicitLocationSupplier.class).
> - to(OnlyLocationOrFirstRegionOptionallyMatchingRegionId.class).
@nacx I'm having issues in restoring
`OnlyLocationOrFirstRegionOptionallyMatchingRegionId` as it fall-back to
`providerUri`which is always the same for each region. Wrong supplier?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308/files/961db5c145342971726063e25776e0011ab8ed36#r78728598
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] add support for whitelisting locations (#308)
ok thanks, I guess this one confused me https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308#issuecomment-239163128 :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308#issuecomment-246973355
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] add support for whitelisting locations (#308)
I don't think so. The last comments have not been addressed. We agreed that the change form region to zone was not good, so all that stuff needs to be reverted. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308#issuecomment-246971336
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] add support for whitelisting locations (#308)
@nacx good to merge? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/308#issuecomment-246959604
