[jclouds/jclouds-labs] Adds new available Azure locations (#362)

Returned by Location API but not whitelisted yet reference https://azure.microsoft.com/en-ca/regions/ You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/362 -- Commit Summary -- * Adds new available Azure locations according to

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Oneandone compute api (#338)

alibazlamit commented on this pull request. > +import org.jclouds.compute.ComputeServiceAdapter; +import org.jclouds.compute.domain.Hardware; +import org.jclouds.compute.domain.Processor; +import org.jclouds.compute.domain.Template; +import org.jclouds.compute.domain.Volume; +import

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1062)

@felfert pushed 2 commits. c3d9a68 Conform to apache jclouds coding standards 5e7139b Added unit test for CreateServerOptions.toString() behavior -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1061)

@felfert pushed 2 commits. 3dc075e Conform to apache jclouds coding standards 21d247c Added unit test for CreateServerOptions.toString() behavior -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Oneandone compute api (#338)

alibazlamit commented on this pull request. > @@ -49,12 +53,23 @@ public OneAndOneProviderMetadata(Builder builder) { public static Properties defaultProperties() { Properties properties = OneAndOneApiMetadata.defaultProperties(); + + properties.setProperty(PROPERTY_REGIONS,

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Improvements to feature (#92)

@andreaturli pushed 1 commit. 10ab107 remove old itests; rename modern-itests to itests -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] bump sshj version to 0.20.0 (#1060)

ok I will do, notice https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/92 already references sshj `0.20.0` so we need this merged before that PR for jclouds-karaf. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Oneandone compute api (#338)

nacx commented on this pull request. > + .password(password) + .privateKey(privateKey) + .build(); + + return new NodeAndInitialCredentials(updateServer, updateServer.id(), serverCredentials); + } + + @Override + public List

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Oneandone compute api (#338)

alibazlamit commented on this pull request. > + .password(password) + .privateKey(privateKey) + .build(); + + return new NodeAndInitialCredentials(updateServer, updateServer.id(), serverCredentials); + } + + @Override + public List

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Oneandone compute api (#338)

alibazlamit commented on this pull request. > + = > org.apache.jclouds.oneandone.rest.domain.Hardware.CreateHardware.create(cores, > 1, ram, hdds); + final Server.CreateServer serverRequest = Server.CreateServer.builder() + .name(name) +

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf » jclouds :: Karaf :: Integration Tests #2089

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2089/

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf #2089

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2089/

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Oneandone compute api (#338)

nacx requested changes on this pull request. Thanks @alibazlamit! I've finally had time to review this properly. There are several comments, and some structural ones such as using the DataCenter as the entity to represent a Location. If we do that (I don't see why we shouldn't), we should also

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-openstack-2.0.x-branch #28

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-2.0.x-branch/28/

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch #33

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/33/-- [...truncated 223.56 KB...] [INFO] Downloaded: https://repo.cloudbees.com/content/repositories/central/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.6/commons-lang-2.6.jar (278 KB at 6769.7 KB/sec) [INFO]

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch #35

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch/35/

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch » Apache jclouds labs #35

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jclouds-labs/35/

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Fixes error in availabilitySetName field (#361)

Closed #361. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/361#event-963196225

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Fixes error in availabilitySetName field (#361)

Thanks @danielestevez! Merged to [master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/b62ff8d9) and [2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/0f954248). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Fixes error in availabilitySetName field (#361)

nacx approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/361#pullrequestreview-22014856

[jclouds/jclouds-labs] Fixes error in availabilitySetName field (#361)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/361 -- Commit Summary -- * Fixes error in availabilitySetName field -- File Changes -- M

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] [JCLOUDS-1233] bump jax-rs version (#1057)

Looks like this has broken jclouds-karaf: https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2088/ features:install jclouds-rackspace-cloudfiles-us java.lang.Exception: Could not start bundle mvn:org.apache.jclouds/jclouds-core/2.1.0-SNAPSHOT in feature(s)

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds-karaf » jclouds :: Karaf :: Integration Tests #2088

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2088/

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds-karaf #2088

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2088/

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] [JCLOUDS-1233] bump jax-rs version (#1057)

k thx -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1057#issuecomment-279981510

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] [JCLOUDS-1233] bump jax-rs version (#1057)

Just for master. We don't want to introduce dependency conflicts in people upgrading to 2.0.1. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1057#issuecomment-279981403

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1061)

Will do. -Fritz Am 15. Februar 2017 11:11:28 MEZ schrieb Ignasi Barrera : >Thanks @felfert! Could you add a simple unit test that verifies the >behaviour of that method with normal and gzipped inputs? This way we >won't break this unintentionally in the future. > >--

[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-1233) Bump JAX-RS spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrea Turli resolved JCLOUDS-1233. --- Resolution: Fixed > Bump JAX-RS spec > > > Key:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] [JCLOUDS-1233] bump jax-rs version (#1057)

merged at [master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/38cb34e1) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1057#issuecomment-279976080

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1233) Bump JAX-RS spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15867607#comment-15867607 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1233: -- Commit

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] [JCLOUDS-1233] bump jax-rs version (#1057)

thanks @nacx -- do you think it is just for master or also 2.0.x? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1057#issuecomment-279970962

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1061)

Thanks @felfert! Could you add a simple unit test that verifies the behaviour of that method with normal and gzipped inputs? This way we won't break this unintentionally in the future. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it