[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1544) Unable to build javadoc with JDK >= 8
Fritz Elfert created JCLOUDS-1544: - Summary: Unable to build javadoc with JDK >= 8 Key: JCLOUDS-1544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1544 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Bug Components: docs Affects Versions: 2.2.0 Reporter: Fritz Elfert Subject says it all. The following PR fixes this: [https://github.com/apache/jclouds/pull/67|https://github.com/apache/jclouds/pull/67] Cheers -Fritz -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1300) Unable to launch gce in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022434#comment-16022434 ] Fritz Elfert commented on JCLOUDS-1300: --- Will that be some new member of TemplateOptions resp. GoogleComputeEngineTemplateOptions or is it supposed to be handled by some existing member already? In case of the latter: which one? > Unable to launch gce in jenkins > --- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 2.0.1 >Reporter: Utkarsh Sharma >Priority: Blocker > Labels: google-compute-engine > Attachments: Screen Shot 2017-05-16 at 12.44.31 PM.png, Screen Shot > 2017-05-16 at 12.58.41 PM.png > > > Unable to launch GCE instance using jclouds plugin in Jenkins. > Needt to launch GCE in custom network and subnetwork. The functionality is > currently under developement. > We are excited about release of this feature, when can we expect its release. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1300) Unable to launch gce in jenkins
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022425#comment-16022425 ] Fritz Elfert commented on JCLOUDS-1300: --- Further info at https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-44292 > Unable to launch gce in jenkins > --- > > Key: JCLOUDS-1300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 2.0.1 >Reporter: Utkarsh Sharma >Priority: Blocker > Labels: google-compute-engine > Attachments: Screen Shot 2017-05-16 at 12.44.31 PM.png, Screen Shot > 2017-05-16 at 12.58.41 PM.png > > > Unable to launch GCE instance using jclouds plugin in Jenkins. > Needt to launch GCE in custom network and subnetwork. The functionality is > currently under developement. > We are excited about release of this feature, when can we expect its release. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1062)
@felfert pushed 2 commits. c3d9a68 Conform to apache jclouds coding standards 5e7139b Added unit test for CreateServerOptions.toString() behavior -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062/files/138484bd544dea7ede054740fa63ed7802cff03e..5e7139b001ac90794cd7741e579c22490bab7bb9
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1061)
@felfert pushed 2 commits. 3dc075e Conform to apache jclouds coding standards 21d247c Added unit test for CreateServerOptions.toString() behavior -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061/files/55e96ac6e824efa03cad1319f508cdd808fa00d4..21d247c65e91f9ddc5fcb691302e5e31a416c578
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1061)
Will do. -Fritz Am 15. Februar 2017 11:11:28 MEZ schrieb Ignasi Barrera: >Thanks @felfert! Could you add a simple unit test that verifies the >behaviour of that method with normal and gzipped inputs? This way we >won't break this unintentionally in the future. > >-- >You are receiving this because you were mentioned. >Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: >https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061#issuecomment-27997 -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061#issuecomment-279979148
[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1239) Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fritz Elfert updated JCLOUDS-1239: -- Labels: openstack-nova (was: ) > Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging > > > Key: JCLOUDS-1239 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 2.0.0 >Reporter: Fritz Elfert >Priority: Minor > Labels: openstack-nova > > It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using > cloud-init for example). > If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which > disrupts the log. > Example output: > {noformat} > >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) > >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) > >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) > >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], > >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, > >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, > >> configDrive=false}) > {noformat} > See https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 (master) and > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 (2.0.x branch) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1239) Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fritz Elfert updated JCLOUDS-1239: -- Description: It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {noformat} >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, >> configDrive=false}) {noformat} See https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 (master) and https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 (2.0.x branch) was: It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {noformat} >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, >> configDrive=false}) {noformat} See https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 (master) and https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 > Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging > > > Key: JCLOUDS-1239 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 2.0.0 >Reporter: Fritz Elfert >Priority: Minor > > It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using > cloud-init for example). > If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which > disrupts the log. > Example output: > {noformat} > >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) > >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) > >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) > >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], > >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, > >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, > >> configDrive=false}) > {noformat} > See https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 (master) and > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 (2.0.x branch) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1239) Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fritz Elfert updated JCLOUDS-1239: -- Description: It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {noformat} >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, >> configDrive=false}) {noformat} See https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 (master) and https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 was: It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {noformat} >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, >> configDrive=false}) {noformat} Will provide a pull request on github (which provides a readable replacement) shortly. > Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging > > > Key: JCLOUDS-1239 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 2.0.0 >Reporter: Fritz Elfert >Priority: Minor > > It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using > cloud-init for example). > If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which > disrupts the log. > Example output: > {noformat} > >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) > >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) > >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) > >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], > >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, > >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, > >> configDrive=false}) > {noformat} > See https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 (master) and > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1062)
Like #1061 , only against the 2.0.x branch. Fixes: JCLOUDS-1239 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062 -- Commit Summary -- * Handle gzipped userdata in logging -- File Changes -- M apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/options/CreateServerOptions.java (9) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1062
[jclouds/jclouds] Handle gzipped userdata in logging (#1061)
This PR replaces gzipped binary "garbage" in openstack-nova debug-logging of userData Fixes: JCLOUDS-1239 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061 -- Commit Summary -- * Handle gzipped userdata in logging -- File Changes -- M apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/options/CreateServerOptions.java (9) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1061
[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1239) Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fritz Elfert updated JCLOUDS-1239: -- Description: It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {noformat} >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, >> configDrive=false}) {noformat} Will provide a pull request on github (which provides a readable replacement) shortly. was: It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {{>> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, configDrive=false})}} Will provide a pull request on github (which provides a readable replacement) shortly. > Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging > > > Key: JCLOUDS-1239 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jclouds-compute >Affects Versions: 2.0.0 >Reporter: Fritz Elfert >Priority: Minor > > It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using > cloud-init for example). > If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which > disrupts the log. > Example output: > {noformat} > >> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) > >> image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) > >> flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) > >> options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], > >> metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, > >> networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, > >> configDrive=false}) > {noformat} > Will provide a pull request on github (which provides a readable replacement) > shortly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1239) Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging
Fritz Elfert created JCLOUDS-1239: - Summary: Gzipped userdata not handled in openstack-nova debug logging Key: JCLOUDS-1239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1239 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Improvement Components: jclouds-compute Affects Versions: 2.0.0 Reporter: Fritz Elfert Priority: Minor It is very common to gzip userdata on openstack to preserve space (when using cloud-init for example). If debug logging is enabled, then this binary data is shown as is which disrupts the log. Example output: {{>> creating new server region(RegionOne) name(foo-f2e) image(41c50bca-cb94-4dc4-b4ce-6c98242eaaa6) flavor(08fbed24-7fcf-42e3-bc5a-cdd7a701ef0c) options(CreateServerOptions{keyName=null, securityGroupNames=[default], metadata={Name=foo, jclouds-group=foo}, userData=*lots of "garbage"*, networks=[73cbec8a-f53d-41af-843b-1cd4a6afc025], availabilityZone=null, configDrive=false})}} Will provide a pull request on github (which provides a readable replacement) shortly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 (#1042)
> Right. I think the use of user metadata here is wrong. It is meant for > providers like OpenStack that support key value pairs in the metadata, but > not for this. Mind changing it and add the userData field to the > DigitalOceanTemplateOptions, and also this comment to properly indicate user > metadata (in the form of arbitrary key value pairs) is not supported? Thanks! Done. I intentionally left the old "wrong" variant via the userMetaData map in place in order to not break existing code. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042#issuecomment-263345268
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 (#1042)
@felfert pushed 1 commit. ec39127 Added byte[] userData according to code review -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042/files/730cecd174f6a769518ebf2d12125f78bc95068b..ec39127a001bea32d30e097877db4fefbc4223e9
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Update index.md (#191)
Looks just like your image here (index of various javadocs shown), but if I click on **any** of those links, I get the following message: Web Listing Disabled The owner of this web site has disabled web listing. If you are the owner of this web site, you can enable web listing by setting X-Container-Meta-Web-Listings. Index File Not Found The owner of this web site has set X-Container-Meta-Web-Index: index.html. However, this file is not found. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/191#issuecomment-263154163
Re: [jclouds/jclouds-site] Update index.md (#191)
> Go to > http://db28c6e508cc7c000f84-4fe8c41c25aa7c42c77a072c81d57bea.r78.cf5.rackcdn.com/ > to review your changes. That link does not work at all?! (Index shown, but nothing else) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/191#issuecomment-263118387
[jclouds/jclouds-site] Update index.md (#191)
Add missing link to 2.0.x javadoc You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/191 -- Commit Summary -- * Update index.md -- File Changes -- M reference/javadoc/index.md (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/191.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/191.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/191
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 (#1042)
@felfert pushed 1 commit. 730cecd Simplified code according to code review -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042/files/487f5e8be846745fd3ad182b3fe592f381643d1e..730cecd174f6a769518ebf2d12125f78bc95068b
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 (#1042)
Later: Just realized, that the tags are a Set and associated with a node so: Of course that makes sense :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042#issuecomment-263073020
Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 (#1042)
@nacx I looked into the tag api documentation and I think, it does **not** fit the jclouds semantic. In jclouds, those are `Map`, but in DigitalOcean they have Map where Object is currently always a droplet. (Most likely, it's an Integer-Id, just like with their key API). I'm going to change make the proposed change in the PR, but while we are here: The private Json member is not needed anymore, but I did not remove it, because I am not shure about the implications of changing the signature of the constructor in line 75. Perhaps **you** can comment on that. Also, Just out of curiosity: The others (meaning: at least openstack-nova and aws-ec2) have a completely different API in jclouds: They implement a separate method in their TemplateOptions specializations: [userData(byte[] userData)](https://jclouds.apache.org/reference/javadoc/1.9.x/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/compute/options/NovaTemplateOptions.html#userData(byte[])). So: why is it that the digitaloceans2 provider follows a different approach here? Resulting code in the jenkins plugin: ```java if (!isNullOrEmpty(userData)) { try { if (options instanceof DigitalOcean2TemplateOptions) { options.userMetadata("user_data", userData); } else { Method userDataMethod = options.getClass().getMethod("userData", new byte[0].getClass()); LOGGER.finest("Setting userData to " + userData); userDataMethod.invoke(options, userData.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); } } catch (Exception e) { LOGGER.log(Level.WARNING, "userData is not supported by provider options class " + options.getClass().getName(), e); } } ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042#issuecomment-263070203
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1206) Handling of user_data in digitalocean2 provider is broken
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15697770#comment-15697770 ] Fritz Elfert commented on JCLOUDS-1206: --- This pull request on github fixes the issue. (Tested with an yet unreleased version of the jenkins jclouds plugin): https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042 > Handling of user_data in digitalocean2 provider is broken > - > > Key: JCLOUDS-1206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1206 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jclouds-compute, jclouds-drivers >Affects Versions: 2.0.0 >Reporter: Fritz Elfert > > The handling of user_data in digitalocean2 is unfortunately completely > broken. The existing code assumes, that it is a string which contains a > json_encoded map of key-value-pairs (containing both tags and user_data). > This is wrong. According to their docs and easily verifyable, it is a SINGLE > string which simply contains cloud-init data or a shell-script. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jclouds/jclouds] Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 (#1042)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042 -- Commit Summary -- * Fixes JCLOUDS-1206 -- File Changes -- M providers/digitalocean2/src/main/java/org/jclouds/digitalocean2/compute/DigitalOcean2ComputeServiceAdapter.java (7) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1042
[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1206) Handling of user_data in digitalocean2 provider is broken
Fritz Elfert created JCLOUDS-1206: - Summary: Handling of user_data in digitalocean2 provider is broken Key: JCLOUDS-1206 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1206 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Bug Components: jclouds-compute, jclouds-drivers Affects Versions: 2.0.0 Reporter: Fritz Elfert The handling of user_data in digitalocean2 is unfortunately completely broken. The existing code assumes, that it is a string which contains a json_encoded map of key-value-pairs (containing both tags and user_data). This is wrong. According to their docs and easily verifyable, it is a SINGLE string which simply contains cloud-init data or a shell-script. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)