Closed #372.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372#event-1038008199
ported to
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/f4771185)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372#issuecomment-293214239
pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/51ddc26f)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372#issuecomment-293207723
cool @nacx, merging now
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372#issuecomment-293206450
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372#pullrequestreview-32057381
@andreaturli pushed 2 commits.
6c94353 comments addressed
89b947a fix VirtualMachineApiMockTest
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
nacx commented on this pull request.
> @@ -76,12 +83,50 @@ public AzureTemplateOptions availabilitySet(String
> availabilitySetName) {
return this;
}
+ public AzureTemplateOptions dataDisks(List
andreaturli commented on this pull request.
> - toString.add("availabilitySet", availabilitySet);
- toString.add("availabilitySetName", availabilitySetName);
- return toString;
+ public int hashCode() {
+ int result = super.hashCode();
+ result = 31 * result +
andreaturli commented on this pull request.
> @@ -76,12 +83,50 @@ public AzureTemplateOptions availabilitySet(String
> availabilitySetName) {
return this;
}
+ public AzureTemplateOptions dataDisks(List
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Just a couple more comments. Most tests seem to be failing due to the change of
the version in the VM api.
> @@ -76,12 +83,50 @@ public AzureTemplateOptions availabilitySet(String
> availabilitySetName) {
return this;
}
+ public
@andreaturli pushed 1 commit.
78bee45 fix CreateOptions enum usage
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372/files/88e4ac2274bc1e1879587afdad4c0fb5b00cca01..78bee45d867e0cbc93aaf881b7e86016760255fd
sorry @nacx and @danielestevez for long radio silence, I'm having another look
at this.
I've addressed most of the comments and rebased, let's see if the builder is
happier.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Ok, there is a version of the ImageExtension implementation that uses the new
Image API working
[here](https://github.com/danielestevez/jclouds-labs/tree/fixGeneralizeImage).
I'd pretty much like to progress on this PR (happy to help!) so that branch can
be rebased on top of this one. This way
danielestevez commented on this pull request.
> + public void deleteImageResourceDoesNotExist() {
+ assertNull(api().delete(imageName));
+ }
+
+ @Test(dependsOnMethods = "deleteImageResourceDoesNotExist")
+ public void CreateVirtualMachineImageFromExistingVM() {
+ String id =
danielestevez commented on this pull request.
> +import org.jclouds.rest.annotations.ResponseParser;
+import org.jclouds.rest.annotations.SelectJson;
+import org.jclouds.rest.binders.BindToJsonPayload;
+
+@Path("/resourcegroups/{resourcegroup}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images")
Thanks @nacx for your review, the impl was a bit raw but I wanted to open the
PR to start the discussion in the open, especially with @danielestevez
As for the plan, yes it is exactly what I had in mind!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Looks like a great start, thanks @andreaturli!
Once this is cleaned up and tests passing the next steps could be (if I'm not
wrong):
* Remove the method that creates an storage service in the base live test class
and update the test methods
- add DiskApi + tests
- add ImageApi + tests
- add TemplateOptions.dataDisks
- use dataDisks in adapter
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372
-- Commit Summary --
* Initial support ManagedDataDisks
-- File Changes
18 matches
Mail list logo