Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
stschikin closed pull request #793: Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2104502150 Thanks for the clarification @stschikin Please close your PR, TIA -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
stschikin commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2104298510 After re-evaluating the entire pull request, it looks like I have confused TypeAttr entities with Attribute entities. Attribute entities need a AttrValue, but TypeAttr do not.

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095961995 Yes, we finally can keep it. A party has only one type, but a party type may have several attributes, hence several relations with a party. -- This is an automated message

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
stschikin commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095786293 The relation to Party seems kind of redundant with the relation to PartyType. I thought I had seen similar relations in other entities of that type, but after rechecking the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095516741 Ha, I think I know why now, because of ``` ``` Right? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095508641 Hi @stschikin, Why did you remove? ``` ``` I see no pb with that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
stschikin commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095332774 Hi @JacquesLeRoux thanks for your advice. I have edited the original post as requested. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2093093862 Hi @stschikin , Please provide a description following our description template. 2 reasons here: 1. What's the problem or rather her reason of improvement 2.

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2092728221 ## [![Quality Gate Passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/qg-passed-20px.png 'Quality Gate

[PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
stschikin opened a new pull request, #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To