wu-sheng closed issue #11982: [Bug] Metrics are not aggregated properly as OTEL
collector targeting per node
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
innerpeacez commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-2066206843
Rabbitmq server metrics are accurate（instance level used node tag）, thx for
your help @wankai123 again.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
wu-sheng closed issue #11982: [Bug] Metrics are not aggregated properly as OTEL
collector targeting per node
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
wu-sheng closed issue #11982: [Bug] Metrics are not aggregated properly as OTEL
collector targeting per node
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-2047362729
@weixiang1862 @pg-yang @innerpeacez We have the new multi-label support
merged. You should be good to fix this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-2016697181
> Yes, it's incorrect. I'm waiting for `aggregate_labels ` with label
parameters
Got it. That will need another one or two weeks.
--
This is an automated message from
pg-yang commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-2016675897
Yes, it's incorrect. I'm waiting for `aggregate_labels ` with label
parameters
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-2016652944
@pg-yang How is the APISIX? The metrics on the dashboard seem not correctly
because they have cross-instance aggregation.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1988781280
> > > Pulsar monitoring is to aggregate the cluster and node(broker) metrics
together now, it should be fine.
> >
> >
> > The question is how to aggregate the
CodePrometheus commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1988769602
> > Pulsar monitoring is to aggregate the cluster and node(broker) metrics
together now, it should be fine.
>
> The question is how to aggregate the metrics of the
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1987288065
> Pulsar monitoring is to aggregate the cluster and node(broker) metrics
together now, it should be fine.
The question is how to aggregate the metrics of the cluster?
CodePrometheus commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1987276192
Pulsar monitoring is to aggregate the cluster and node(broker) metrics
together now, it should be fine.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
CodePrometheus commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1985163909
@wu-sheng I'll try to check pulsar first.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1985158286
> @wu-sheng I would be willing, of course! I'll do recheck on this weekend.
Which one will you check? Let's avoid duplicate works with others.
--
This is an automated
CodePrometheus commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1985151340
@wu-sheng I would be willing, of course! I'll do recheck on this weekend.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1980821173
@weixiang1862 As you asked about, we posted
https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11992 for v10.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1980252064
In your case, the data in the DB should be `http_status_401{192.168.0.1=5,
192.168.0.3=1, 192.168.0.2=2}`. Please verify.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1980250350
I don't think we support multiple labels after you have done the persistent.
```
http_status{host=192.168.0.1, status=401} 5
http_status{host=192.168.0.3,
pg-yang commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1980247042
To build service level metrics with instance/node level metrics through
`AggregateLabels Operation`, I think `AggregateLabels` should support
aggregation through specified
wankai123 commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1979901855
Kafka monitoring service's MAL aggregates the metrics with `cluster and
broker`, so it's good.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
innerpeacez commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1978109337
ES checked, the metrics data from one cluster-level API.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1977919068
For all the owners, this list doesn't mean all monitoring at service level
is inaccurate due to the way od scraping from OTEL. Please recheck first and
only fix if it fits the
wu-sheng commented on issue #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982#issuecomment-1977891270
@CodePrometheus If you could help this, please let me know.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
wu-sheng opened a new issue, #11982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/11982
### Search before asking
- [X] I had searched in the
[issues](https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and found no
similar issues.
### Apache SkyWalking Component
24 matches
Mail list logo
