[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-18 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-493687219 case1:common route ```yml server: port: 8080 spring: cloud: gateway: routes: - id: provider_route

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-18 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-493681391 > As the test tool can't support your PR. Could you provide a screenshot to show the result? OK

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-12 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-491586725 Some difficulties encountered: 1 testcase gateway 2.1.0 version, the result of trace data collection is not very stable, sometimes it will

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-10 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-491236066 I didn't find out why `actual data` has no trace data, it looks like it didn't make a http request, but it can't be reproduced in my local

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-08 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-490741815 > OK. I has ping @ascrutae to deal with your other PRs. OK This is an

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-08 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-490741126 > We need to add witness class for this plugin, right? Yes, I am still trying to be compatible with the low version

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-06 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-489672272 > > I think it's best to separate reactor-netty, webflux, and gateway. > > If you can do this, I think it is a good idea. If you could

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-06 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-489670411 > > I think it's best to separate reactor-netty, webflux, and gateway. > > If you can do this, I think it is a good idea. If you could

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-06 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-489664577 > @zhaoyuguang Is this plugin too complex and conflict with other plugins? If so, let's discuss how to do it first. I noticed this PR is still

[GitHub] [skywalking] zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin

2019-05-06 Thread GitBox
zhaoyuguang commented on issue #2517: [WIP]Spring cloud gateways plugin URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/2517#issuecomment-489661461 > In my opinion, this plugin could be split into two plugins: reactor netty http plugin + spring cloud gateway plugin? This also relate